linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@samsung.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Anuj gupta <anuj1072538@gmail.com>,
	Anuj Gupta <anuj20.g@samsung.com>,
	axboe@kernel.dk, kbusch@kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
	asml.silence@gmail.com, brauner@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, io-uring@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	gost.dev@samsung.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	vishak.g@samsung.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/10] io_uring/rw: add support to send metadata along with read/write
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 17:00:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241105160051.GA7599@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b52ecf88-1786-4b6f-b8f3-86cccaa51917@samsung.com>

On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 09:21:27PM +0530, Kanchan Joshi wrote:
> Can add the documentation (if this version is palatable for Jens/Pavel), 
> but this was discussed in previous iteration:
> 
> 1. Each meta type may have different space requirement in SQE.
> 
> Only for PI, we need so much space that we can't fit that in first SQE. 
> The SQE128 requirement is only for PI type.
> Another different meta type may just fit into the first SQE. For that we 
> don't have to mandate SQE128.

Ok, I'm really confused now.  The way I understood Anuj was that this
is NOT about block level metadata, but about other uses of the big SQE.

Which version is right?  Or did I just completely misunderstand Anuj?

> 2. If two meta types are known not to co-exist, they can be kept in the 
> same place within SQE. Since each meta-type is a flag, we can check what 
> combinations are valid within io_uring and throw the error in case of 
> incompatibility.

And this sounds like what you refer to is not actually block metadata
as in this patchset or nvme, (or weirdly enough integrity in the block
layer code).

> 3. Previous version was relying on SQE128 flag. If user set the ring 
> that way, it is assumed that PI information was sent.
> This is more explicitly conveyed now - if user passed META_TYPE_PI flag, 
> it has sent the PI. This comment in the code:
> 
> +       /* if sqe->meta_type is META_TYPE_PI, last 32 bytes are for PI */
> +       union {
> 
> If this flag is not passed, parsing of second SQE is skipped, which is 
> the current behavior as now also one can send regular (non pi) 
> read/write on SQE128 ring.

And while I don't understand how this threads in with the previous
statements, this makes sense.  If you only want to send a pointer (+len)
to metadata you can use the normal 64-byte SQE.  If you want to send
a PI tuple you need SEQ128.  Is that what the various above statements
try to express?  If so the right API to me would be to have two flags:

 - a flag that a pointer to metadata is passed.  This can work with
   a 64-bit SQE.
 - another flag that a PI tuple is passed.  This requires a 128-byte
   and also the previous flag.


> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
---end quoted text---

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-05 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20241104141427epcas5p2174ded627e2d785294ac4977b011a75b@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2024-11-04 14:05 ` [PATCH v7 00/10] Read/Write with meta/integrity Anuj Gupta
2024-11-04 14:05   ` [PATCH v7 01/10] block: define set of integrity flags to be inherited by cloned bip Anuj Gupta
2024-11-04 14:05   ` [PATCH v7 02/10] block: copy back bounce buffer to user-space correctly in case of split Anuj Gupta
2024-11-05 10:03     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-05 13:15       ` Anuj gupta
2024-11-04 14:05   ` [PATCH v7 03/10] block: modify bio_integrity_map_user to accept iov_iter as argument Anuj Gupta
2024-11-04 14:05   ` [PATCH v7 04/10] fs, iov_iter: define meta io descriptor Anuj Gupta
2024-11-05  9:55     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-04 14:05   ` [PATCH v7 05/10] fs: introduce IOCB_HAS_METADATA for metadata Anuj Gupta
2024-11-04 14:05   ` [PATCH v7 06/10] io_uring/rw: add support to send metadata along with read/write Anuj Gupta
2024-11-05  9:56     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-05 13:04       ` Anuj gupta
2024-11-05 13:56         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-05 15:51           ` Kanchan Joshi
2024-11-05 16:00             ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-11-05 16:23               ` Keith Busch
2024-11-05 16:50                 ` Kanchan Joshi
2024-11-06  5:29                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-06  6:00                   ` Kanchan Joshi
2024-11-06  6:12                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-05 16:38               ` Kanchan Joshi
2024-11-06  5:33                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-04 14:05   ` [PATCH v7 07/10] block: introduce BIP_CHECK_GUARD/REFTAG/APPTAG bip_flags Anuj Gupta
2024-11-04 14:05   ` [PATCH v7 08/10] nvme: add support for passing on the application tag Anuj Gupta
2024-11-04 14:06   ` [PATCH v7 09/10] scsi: add support for user-meta interface Anuj Gupta
2024-11-04 14:06   ` [PATCH v7 10/10] block: add support to pass user meta buffer Anuj Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241105160051.GA7599@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=anuj1072538@gmail.com \
    --cc=anuj20.g@samsung.com \
    --cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=joshi.k@samsung.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=vishak.g@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).