From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B76DA43173; Thu, 2 Jan 2025 18:44:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1735843445; cv=none; b=OjyNJD0NusVwj9pK4rONEmEzWGEHrkKZhpPuTbFFNkfT9SID3sSSYmHYN/hCoBcvli581wqaYhy13RK2MhtQSU1NhSnAdvBcF7XGX+yYwTn7PzLyMqRD7fkLvimBd/67Fh6UBwvuUjALhySx2iArfOMSmfxZivwbZbrp9TDf4cA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1735843445; c=relaxed/simple; bh=bzCCR7I1hYB6mMtP87y2PHNk4bChXkKHtX8anutuhM0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=i07wsqHSbSdrX0k2to2wRtD9NnBFzW8YkhbMz1vTFu8FRn3z8XZwMnkqHlPUkyLvQI+OR1QfyRyoNPe06u0oLydz8Ao4hCxFB/pBrgTrZ7KwIJgIu+sfw/TlkBfw4kFIVORHLDMThUnC+5HVFlwNNtuWA3XgTvCtpDKHAmWGhoE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=q2tBHY7R; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="q2tBHY7R" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C02F1C4CED6; Thu, 2 Jan 2025 18:44:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1735843445; bh=bzCCR7I1hYB6mMtP87y2PHNk4bChXkKHtX8anutuhM0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=q2tBHY7R4JhKArYRaLv4nJ746fLZDog3ea8uPpowXsNZFscEwoRVzKLK/iCbDvG9C tM0LejspIkmTD7RlTNjpXuSa/koKi3hQnQ7M5jSBMF7MpWGW5dts7e+8bjZiUbzYug tLEZTXcTooiysKrUmk8Dv7cyKbvZaobhcgBYamgRDqz7Bu6aaLDNorXGimoOH1mjPK 5ZXY6efsx5LLtMvet2z218dtawUgGcTjLTzLFIEDdre+PnDnZpvnBfJHTNTpSFVOTD fCVYTfJH0Mltg3nJrtzgfOQiiMDLJw3eQkRu019mqVucMtj8DdpmVjdkyPs/2HaoDG WBxTJ40ROYCFQ== Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2025 18:44:03 +0000 From: Eric Biggers To: "Martin K. Petersen" Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Bartosz Golaszewski , Gaurav Kashyap , Adrian Hunter , Alim Akhtar , Avri Altman , Bart Van Assche , Bjorn Andersson , Dmitry Baryshkov , "James E . J . Bottomley" , Jens Axboe , Konrad Dybcio , Manivannan Sadhasivam , Ulf Hansson Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/15] Support for hardware-wrapped inline encryption keys Message-ID: <20250102184403.GD49952@google.com> References: <20241213041958.202565-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 01:40:48PM -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > > Eric, > > > This patchset adds support for hardware-wrapped inline encryption > > keys, a security feature supported by some SoCs. It adds the block and > > fscrypt framework for the feature as well as support for it with UFS > > on Qualcomm SoCs. > > Applied patches 1-4 to 6.14/scsi-staging, thanks! > > I had originally queued patch 1 in 6.13/scsi-fixes but moved it to 6.14 > and kept the stable tag to accommodate the rest of the series. Hope > that's OK given the short runway we have left for this release. Yes, that's fine. Thanks. - Eric