From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] block: Fix __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues() queue freeze and limits lock order
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 11:00:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250106100002.GA20647@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <30064337-9fe1-47c7-b4ec-c999b06a1b47@kernel.org>
On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 06:58:00PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> Ah, yes, that would potentially be an issue... Hmmm... Maybe a better solution
> would be to move the start update out of the main loop and do it first, before
> the freeze. What I do not fully understand with the code of this function is
> that it does freeze and limit update for each tag list of the tag set, but
> there is only a single request queue for all of them. So I am confused. Why
> does the blk_mq_freeze_queue and poll limit setting have to be done in the loop
> multiple times for each tag list ? I do not see it... If we can move these out
> of the tag list loops, then correcting the ordering becomes easy.
I've come up with a version that simply never updates the flag. About
to send it out.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-06 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-04 13:25 [PATCH 0/3] Fix queue freeze and limit locking order Damien Le Moal
2025-01-04 13:25 ` [PATCH 1/3] block: Fix sysfs queue freeze and limits lock order Damien Le Moal
2025-01-04 16:26 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-01-06 8:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06 3:31 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-06 3:35 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-01-06 3:40 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-06 8:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06 11:15 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-06 15:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-07 0:45 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-07 6:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06 8:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-04 13:25 ` [PATCH 2/3] block: Fix __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues() " Damien Le Moal
2025-01-06 8:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-06 9:58 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-01-06 10:00 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-01-04 13:25 ` [PATCH 3/3] nvme: Fix " Damien Le Moal
2025-01-06 8:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250106100002.GA20647@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).