linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de, ming.lei@redhat.com,
	dlemoal@kernel.org, hare@suse.de, axboe@kernel.dk,
	gjoyce@ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 4/7] block: Introduce a dedicated lock for protecting queue elevator updates
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 16:12:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250225151208.GA6455@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250225133110.1441035-5-nilay@linux.ibm.com>

This still has the capitalization of the first letter after the block:
prefix in the subject line.

> +	 * Attributes which require some form of locking
> +	 * other than q->sysfs_lock.

Nit: "other than" easily fits on the previous line.

Otherwise looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-25 15:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-25 13:30 [PATCHv4 0/7] block: fix lock order and remove redundant locking Nilay Shroff
2025-02-25 13:30 ` [PATCHv4 1/7] block: acquire q->limits_lock while reading sysfs attributes Nilay Shroff
2025-02-25 13:30 ` [PATCHv4 2/7] block: move q->sysfs_lock and queue-freeze under show/store method Nilay Shroff
2025-02-25 13:30 ` [PATCHv4 3/7] block: remove q->sysfs_lock for attributes which don't need it Nilay Shroff
2025-02-25 13:30 ` [PATCHv4 4/7] block: Introduce a dedicated lock for protecting queue elevator updates Nilay Shroff
2025-02-25 15:12   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-02-26 12:12     ` Nilay Shroff
2025-02-25 13:30 ` [PATCHv4 5/7] block: protect nr_requests update using q->elevator_lock Nilay Shroff
2025-02-25 13:30 ` [PATCHv4 6/7] block: protect wbt_lat_usec " Nilay Shroff
2025-02-25 15:13   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 12:11     ` Nilay Shroff
2025-02-26  7:33   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-25 13:30 ` [PATCHv4 7/7] block: protect read_ahead_kb using q->limits_lock Nilay Shroff
2025-02-25 15:14   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 12:10     ` Nilay Shroff

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250225151208.GA6455@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=gjoyce@ibm.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).