From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 213FE1C5D50; Sun, 2 Mar 2025 22:23:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740954225; cv=none; b=AB4RjSuSXcpMmfno2KIujMyzXjBNdEiISqr5sVwNuyB6Tm3ObnjQE1itqNQmWoGltEv2AJbXSApBeBSu934BIR+wp3yMoPX3zm9ZV/ZmE8KnNqkZIX8piCoeB30m/Z6vXlsChSlvtJz9Gec+ALOaa1zIS1/x3dc4ckPhnAeiJgw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740954225; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nLV+62Qa713WIu46HAPLlFz0UlZWvoKKx2UAgpOocIc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=EGsRGc7EDQTto5g9LY1JaEYYqmmo895+fLrBuILudLnzD680X2zh29LUVFnP/la6WVKbbWZPCI0ZyrugYSXztsTCgi/pmf/h7hGZQyeRvtbiEoSlnoQ82kg7QsvYr50F+nZwdGQcMcS9jK6lBjMTXyxtwg4st8tR7plURkV4n0g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=opq66txW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="opq66txW" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0A623C4CED6; Sun, 2 Mar 2025 22:23:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1740954224; bh=nLV+62Qa713WIu46HAPLlFz0UlZWvoKKx2UAgpOocIc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=opq66txWaieBNphh77G4K/3QDIyPz5IYBhi8JsbxISX2zX0H8iOSu3crjwnMb0B27 9a/USK+8NUXXnoV/sCf6UC1FCBuvqF3mIlc0j+CA3nHa1mwMpwXl1FzluTotcnxugx e/meZQGd6sJ4S7GdR4vLeBh1Hx5bo5NM0OnzZU8TCASpTvakVoxbdyDqJkPI4eE4kz SZBVDP9lICT47poXWmkH+JoqEiEU2tND1jYPEhEWDNYzLT9jHuDQOWkOK0xhCLVxas YWPE/a+SgSa/bpdb6GbXNKg3llv4p74PJ1NzDnZ4zPr74mScLcZh8IwSPvUrVHZe0t L3/RXhdgtFIdA== Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2025 14:23:36 -0800 From: Eric Biggers To: Bartosz Golaszewski , Bjorn Andersson Cc: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Gaurav Kashyap , Dmitry Baryshkov , Jens Axboe , Konrad Dybcio , Manivannan Sadhasivam Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 0/4] Driver and fscrypt support for HW-wrapped inline encryption keys Message-ID: <20250302222336.GD2079@quark.localdomain> References: <20250210202336.349924-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 09:12:11AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 9:25 PM Eric Biggers wrote: > > > > This patchset is based on linux-block/for-next and is also available at: > > > > git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/fscrypt/linux.git wrapped-keys-v12 > > > > Now that the block layer support for hardware-wrapped inline encryption > > keys has been applied for 6.15 > > (https://lore.kernel.org/r/173920649542.40307.8847368467858129326.b4-ty@kernel.dk), > > this series refreshes the remaining patches. They add the support for > > hardware-wrapped inline encryption keys to the Qualcomm ICE and UFS > > drivers and to fscrypt. All tested on SM8650 with xfstests. > > > > TBD whether these will land in 6.15 too, or wait until 6.16 when the > > block patches that patches 2-4 depend on will have landed. > > > > Could Jens provide an immutable branch with these patches? I don't > think there's a reason to delay it for another 3 months TBH. They don't seem to be on an immutable branch, so I'll just wait until the next cycle, rather than trying to do something weird where I rebase the fscrypt tree onto the block tree and also include driver patches. TBH, I've already been waiting 5 years to land this, so an extra 9 weeks is not a big deal :-) The first patch "soc: qcom: ice: make qcom_ice_program_key() take struct blk_crypto_key" does not depend on the block ones though, and it could land in 6.15. Bjorn, would you like to take that patch through your tree to get it out of the way? - Eric