From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39A40231A22; Mon, 10 Mar 2025 16:42:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741624920; cv=none; b=n2XqwbP1i6OH/iFGcaRff0v7Ca+AghmspeyJXSnxsoHbR1P97dRK4vv7XeWA31+oTw2rdZbOK2uOoGl89D2oQHK5BwSqcF4M35vbtgG9pOpYsPnF6ISGy8K/o3p/CG8D2oN757TKTW4QD09i7rVUpxIE0ChJW6Y0nfvRDFEUJMQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741624920; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AonGS/l9pN/Ns1XP5OZmwRVEfJkZ3sbj6I9acRs39sE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=q50/nSn2zxdZLkVu1CoWEy35xpfB1OCNPu3CWJKYR82h6LDy+01CweaAIOdP3O2uOxiwBkadXNAftggazfxsbP+7hXJOPKS0yKDJLmJIxfH6HqSdDaEtMdQ3HcXSDDbxZYTXP+7tNWrC3SW0yiX099EUAnYK4xpHAM+bzRSZOBw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=gut4zvA9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="gut4zvA9" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A759CC4CEE5; Mon, 10 Mar 2025 16:41:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1741624920; bh=AonGS/l9pN/Ns1XP5OZmwRVEfJkZ3sbj6I9acRs39sE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=gut4zvA9kSCVVqb5oEIk8UB9IOhmL4oBHTFbGoJztp6Zqvb/DrD/Va8bPfj94dGwC ikHc7Eh8+LX8looTrA7reyhmYHHbJdEuhPR1H9QoyG28tfYDeyKy37medElaSpwPRu YJCkVJ/egYaHHU6+XQVehmImsNMchRh2RdUs8lJcKWr+EOrPc+udO/qXtYSaCARlHn 14RAfMCjToz2fgO4f4I0b9o6xZ10Lyr0J2QSIpM6FM5o47pY2d0lkPV0qCEZsyycZP zJnC8XZ945L10nmbU+DpkCVRj1lPJzcj8oD0OPq8TiiuluI4Ddco+B4GQjzmZSd1Fp OXhceAqh5whUQ== Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 09:41:58 -0700 From: Eric Biggers To: Bjorn Andersson Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski , linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Gaurav Kashyap , Dmitry Baryshkov , Jens Axboe , Konrad Dybcio , Manivannan Sadhasivam Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 0/4] Driver and fscrypt support for HW-wrapped inline encryption keys Message-ID: <20250310164158.GA1701@sol.localdomain> References: <20250210202336.349924-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20250302222336.GD2079@quark.localdomain> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250302222336.GD2079@quark.localdomain> On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 02:23:36PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote: > > > TBD whether these will land in 6.15 too, or wait until 6.16 when the > > > block patches that patches 2-4 depend on will have landed. > > > > > > > Could Jens provide an immutable branch with these patches? I don't > > think there's a reason to delay it for another 3 months TBH. > > They don't seem to be on an immutable branch, so I'll just wait until the next > cycle, rather than trying to do something weird where I rebase the fscrypt tree > onto the block tree and also include driver patches. TBH, I've already been > waiting 5 years to land this, so an extra 9 weeks is not a big deal :-) > > The first patch "soc: qcom: ice: make qcom_ice_program_key() take struct > blk_crypto_key" does not depend on the block ones though, and it could land in > 6.15. Bjorn, would you like to take that patch through your tree to get it out > of the way? Bjorn, could you apply patch 1 to your tree? Thanks! - Eric