From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jooyung Han <jooyung@google.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>,
zkabelac@redhat.com, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH V3 1/5] loop: simplify do_req_filebacked()
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 09:26:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250322012617.354222-2-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250322012617.354222-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
lo_rw_aio() is only called for READ/WRITE operation, which can be
figured out from request directly, so remove 'rw' parameter from
lo_rw_aio(), meantime rename the local variable as 'dir' which makes
the check more readable in lo_rw_aio().
Meantime add lo_rw_simple() so that do_req_filebacked() can be
simplified in the following way:
```
if (cmd->use_aio)
return lo_rw_aio(lo, cmd, pos);
else
return lo_rw_simple(lo, rq, pos);
```
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
drivers/block/loop.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index 674527d770dc..339b19671450 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -277,6 +277,13 @@ static int lo_read_simple(struct loop_device *lo, struct request *rq,
return 0;
}
+static int lo_rw_simple(struct loop_device *lo, struct request *rq, loff_t pos)
+{
+ if (req_op(rq) == REQ_OP_READ)
+ return lo_read_simple(lo, rq, pos);
+ return lo_write_simple(lo, rq, pos);
+}
+
static void loop_clear_limits(struct loop_device *lo, int mode)
{
struct queue_limits lim = queue_limits_start_update(lo->lo_queue);
@@ -392,13 +399,13 @@ static void lo_rw_aio_complete(struct kiocb *iocb, long ret)
lo_rw_aio_do_completion(cmd);
}
-static int lo_rw_aio(struct loop_device *lo, struct loop_cmd *cmd,
- loff_t pos, int rw)
+static int lo_rw_aio(struct loop_device *lo, struct loop_cmd *cmd, loff_t pos)
{
struct iov_iter iter;
struct req_iterator rq_iter;
struct bio_vec *bvec;
struct request *rq = blk_mq_rq_from_pdu(cmd);
+ int dir = (req_op(rq) == REQ_OP_READ) ? ITER_DEST : ITER_SOURCE;
struct bio *bio = rq->bio;
struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file;
struct bio_vec tmp;
@@ -440,7 +447,7 @@ static int lo_rw_aio(struct loop_device *lo, struct loop_cmd *cmd,
}
atomic_set(&cmd->ref, 2);
- iov_iter_bvec(&iter, rw, bvec, nr_bvec, blk_rq_bytes(rq));
+ iov_iter_bvec(&iter, dir, bvec, nr_bvec, blk_rq_bytes(rq));
iter.iov_offset = offset;
cmd->iocb.ki_pos = pos;
@@ -449,7 +456,7 @@ static int lo_rw_aio(struct loop_device *lo, struct loop_cmd *cmd,
cmd->iocb.ki_flags = IOCB_DIRECT;
cmd->iocb.ki_ioprio = IOPRIO_PRIO_VALUE(IOPRIO_CLASS_NONE, 0);
- if (rw == ITER_SOURCE)
+ if (dir == ITER_SOURCE)
ret = file->f_op->write_iter(&cmd->iocb, &iter);
else
ret = file->f_op->read_iter(&cmd->iocb, &iter);
@@ -490,15 +497,11 @@ static int do_req_filebacked(struct loop_device *lo, struct request *rq)
case REQ_OP_DISCARD:
return lo_fallocate(lo, rq, pos, FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE);
case REQ_OP_WRITE:
- if (cmd->use_aio)
- return lo_rw_aio(lo, cmd, pos, ITER_SOURCE);
- else
- return lo_write_simple(lo, rq, pos);
case REQ_OP_READ:
if (cmd->use_aio)
- return lo_rw_aio(lo, cmd, pos, ITER_DEST);
+ return lo_rw_aio(lo, cmd, pos);
else
- return lo_read_simple(lo, rq, pos);
+ return lo_rw_simple(lo, rq, pos);
default:
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
return -EIO;
--
2.47.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-22 1:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-22 1:26 [PATCH V3 0/5] loop: improve loop aio perf by IOCB_NOWAIT Ming Lei
2025-03-22 1:26 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-03-22 1:26 ` [PATCH V3 2/5] loop: cleanup lo_rw_aio() Ming Lei
2025-03-22 1:26 ` [PATCH V3 3/5] loop: move command blkcg/memcg initialization into loop_queue_work Ming Lei
2025-03-22 1:26 ` [PATCH V3 4/5] loop: try to handle loop aio command via NOWAIT IO first Ming Lei
2025-03-22 1:26 ` [PATCH V3 5/5] loop: add hint for handling aio via IOCB_NOWAIT Ming Lei
2025-03-22 17:40 ` [PATCH V3 0/5] loop: improve loop aio perf by IOCB_NOWAIT Jens Axboe
2025-03-24 14:50 ` Jens Axboe
2025-03-25 1:59 ` Ming Lei
2025-03-25 12:07 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250322012617.354222-2-ming.lei@redhat.com \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jooyung@google.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
--cc=zkabelac@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox