[PATCH 01/15] block: don't call freeze queue in elevator_switch() and elevator_disable()

[Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>]

Both elevator_switch() and elevator_disable() are called from sysfs
store and updating nr_hw_queue code paths only.

And in the two code paths, queue has been frozen already, so don't call
freeze queue in the two functions.

Reviewed-by: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
 block/elevator.c | 9 ++-------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/elevator.c b/block/elevator.c
index b4d08026b02c..5051a98dc08c 100644
--- a/block/elevator.c
+++ b/block/elevator.c
@@ -615,12 +615,11 @@ void elevator_init_mq(struct request_queue *q)
  */
 int elevator_switch(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_type *new_e)
 {
-	unsigned int memflags;
 	int ret;
 
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(q->mq_freeze_depth == 0);
 	lockdep_assert_held(&q->elevator_lock);
 
-	memflags = blk_mq_freeze_queue(q);
 	blk_mq_quiesce_queue(q);
 
 	if (q->elevator) {
@@ -641,7 +640,6 @@ int elevator_switch(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_type *new_e)
 
 out_unfreeze:
 	blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(q);
-	blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q, memflags);
 
 	if (ret) {
 		pr_warn("elv: switch to \"%s\" failed, falling back to \"none\"\n",
@@ -653,11 +651,9 @@ int elevator_switch(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_type *new_e)
 
 void elevator_disable(struct request_queue *q)
 {
-	unsigned int memflags;
-
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(q->mq_freeze_depth == 0);
 	lockdep_assert_held(&q->elevator_lock);
 
-	memflags = blk_mq_freeze_queue(q);
 	blk_mq_quiesce_queue(q);
 
 	elv_unregister_queue(q);
@@ -668,7 +664,6 @@ void elevator_disable(struct request_queue *q)
 	blk_add_trace_msg(q, "elv switch: none");
 
 	blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(q);
-	blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q, memflags);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.47.0