linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>,
	Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/9] ublk: add ublk_force_abort_dev()
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 19:25:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250414112554.3025113-4-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250414112554.3025113-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>

Add ublk_force_abort_dev() for handling ublk_nosrv_dev_should_queue_io()
in ublk_stop_dev(). Then queue quiesce and unquiesce can be paired in
single function.

Meantime not change device state to QUIESCED any more, since the disk is
going to be removed soon.

Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 21 ++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index 79f42ed7339f..7e2c4084c243 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -1743,22 +1743,20 @@ static void __ublk_quiesce_dev(struct ublk_device *ub)
 	ub->dev_info.state = UBLK_S_DEV_QUIESCED;
 }
 
-static void ublk_unquiesce_dev(struct ublk_device *ub)
+static void ublk_force_abort_dev(struct ublk_device *ub)
 {
 	int i;
 
-	pr_devel("%s: unquiesce ub: dev_id %d state %s\n",
+	pr_devel("%s: force abort ub: dev_id %d state %s\n",
 			__func__, ub->dev_info.dev_id,
 			ub->dev_info.state == UBLK_S_DEV_LIVE ?
 			"LIVE" : "QUIESCED");
-	/* quiesce_work has run. We let requeued rqs be aborted
-	 * before running fallback_wq. "force_abort" must be seen
-	 * after request queue is unqiuesced. Then del_gendisk()
-	 * can move on.
-	 */
+	blk_mq_quiesce_queue(ub->ub_disk->queue);
+	if (ub->dev_info.state == UBLK_S_DEV_LIVE)
+		ublk_wait_tagset_rqs_idle(ub);
+
 	for (i = 0; i < ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues; i++)
 		ublk_get_queue(ub, i)->force_abort = true;
-
 	blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(ub->ub_disk->queue);
 	/* We may have requeued some rqs in ublk_quiesce_queue() */
 	blk_mq_kick_requeue_list(ub->ub_disk->queue);
@@ -1786,11 +1784,8 @@ static void ublk_stop_dev(struct ublk_device *ub)
 	mutex_lock(&ub->mutex);
 	if (!ub->ub_disk)
 		goto unlock;
-	if (ublk_nosrv_dev_should_queue_io(ub)) {
-		if (ub->dev_info.state == UBLK_S_DEV_LIVE)
-			__ublk_quiesce_dev(ub);
-		ublk_unquiesce_dev(ub);
-	}
+	if (ublk_nosrv_dev_should_queue_io(ub))
+		ublk_force_abort_dev(ub);
 	del_gendisk(ub->ub_disk);
 	disk = ublk_detach_disk(ub);
 	put_disk(disk);
-- 
2.47.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-04-14 11:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-14 11:25 [PATCH 0/9] ublk: simplify & improve IO canceling Ming Lei
2025-04-14 11:25 ` [PATCH 1/9] ublk: don't try to stop disk if ->ub_disk is NULL Ming Lei
2025-04-14 19:44   ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-15  1:32     ` Ming Lei
2025-04-14 11:25 ` [PATCH 2/9] ublk: properly serialize all FETCH_REQs Ming Lei
2025-04-14 19:58   ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-14 20:39     ` Jens Axboe
2025-04-14 20:52       ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-14 21:00         ` Jens Axboe
2025-04-15  1:40         ` Ming Lei
2025-04-16  1:13       ` Ming Lei
2025-04-16  1:17         ` Jens Axboe
2025-04-16  2:04           ` Ming Lei
2025-04-16  1:04     ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-14 11:25 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-04-14 20:06   ` [PATCH 3/9] ublk: add ublk_force_abort_dev() Uday Shankar
2025-04-14 11:25 ` [PATCH 4/9] ublk: rely on ->canceling for dealing with ublk_nosrv_dev_should_queue_io Ming Lei
2025-04-14 20:15   ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-15  1:48     ` Ming Lei
2025-04-14 11:25 ` [PATCH 5/9] ublk: move device reset into ublk_ch_release() Ming Lei
2025-04-14 20:29   ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-15  1:50     ` Ming Lei
2025-04-14 11:25 ` [PATCH 6/9] ublk: improve detection and handling of ublk server exit Ming Lei
2025-04-14 20:36   ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-15  1:54     ` Ming Lei
2025-04-14 11:25 ` [PATCH 7/9] ublk: remove __ublk_quiesce_dev() Ming Lei
2025-04-14 20:37   ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-14 11:25 ` [PATCH 8/9] ublk: simplify aborting ublk request Ming Lei
2025-04-14 20:42   ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-14 11:25 ` [PATCH 9/9] selftests: ublk: add generic_06 for covering fault inject Ming Lei
2025-04-14 20:44   ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-15  1:57     ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250414112554.3025113-4-ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=csander@purestorage.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).