From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>,
Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2 1/8] ublk: properly serialize all FETCH_REQs
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:54:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250416035444.99569-2-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250416035444.99569-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
From: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
Most uring_cmds issued against ublk character devices are serialized
because each command affects only one queue, and there is an early check
which only allows a single task (the queue's ubq_daemon) to issue
uring_cmds against that queue. However, this mechanism does not work for
FETCH_REQs, since they are expected before ubq_daemon is set. Since
FETCH_REQs are only used at initialization and not in the fast path,
serialize them using the per-ublk-device mutex. This fixes a number of
data races that were previously possible if a badly behaved ublk server
decided to issue multiple FETCH_REQs against the same qid/tag
concurrently.
Reported-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
Signed-off-by: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index cdb1543fa4a9..bf47f9cb8329 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -1832,8 +1832,8 @@ static void ublk_nosrv_work(struct work_struct *work)
/* device can only be started after all IOs are ready */
static void ublk_mark_io_ready(struct ublk_device *ub, struct ublk_queue *ubq)
+ __must_hold(&ub->mutex)
{
- mutex_lock(&ub->mutex);
ubq->nr_io_ready++;
if (ublk_queue_ready(ubq)) {
ubq->ubq_daemon = current;
@@ -1845,7 +1845,6 @@ static void ublk_mark_io_ready(struct ublk_device *ub, struct ublk_queue *ubq)
}
if (ub->nr_queues_ready == ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues)
complete_all(&ub->completion);
- mutex_unlock(&ub->mutex);
}
static void ublk_handle_need_get_data(struct ublk_device *ub, int q_id,
@@ -1929,6 +1928,52 @@ static int ublk_unregister_io_buf(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
return io_buffer_unregister_bvec(cmd, index, issue_flags);
}
+static int ublk_fetch(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, struct ublk_queue *ubq,
+ struct ublk_io *io, __u64 buf_addr)
+{
+ struct ublk_device *ub = ubq->dev;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * When handling FETCH command for setting up ublk uring queue,
+ * ub->mutex is the innermost lock, and we won't block for handling
+ * FETCH, so it is fine even for IO_URING_F_NONBLOCK.
+ */
+ mutex_lock(&ub->mutex);
+ /* UBLK_IO_FETCH_REQ is only allowed before queue is setup */
+ if (ublk_queue_ready(ubq)) {
+ ret = -EBUSY;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ /* allow each command to be FETCHed at most once */
+ if (io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_OWNED_BY_SRV);
+
+ if (ublk_need_map_io(ubq)) {
+ /*
+ * FETCH_RQ has to provide IO buffer if NEED GET
+ * DATA is not enabled
+ */
+ if (!buf_addr && !ublk_need_get_data(ubq))
+ goto out;
+ } else if (buf_addr) {
+ /* User copy requires addr to be unset */
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ ublk_fill_io_cmd(io, cmd, buf_addr);
+ ublk_mark_io_ready(ub, ubq);
+out:
+ mutex_unlock(&ub->mutex);
+ return ret;
+}
+
static int __ublk_ch_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
unsigned int issue_flags,
const struct ublksrv_io_cmd *ub_cmd)
@@ -1985,33 +2030,9 @@ static int __ublk_ch_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
case UBLK_IO_UNREGISTER_IO_BUF:
return ublk_unregister_io_buf(cmd, ub_cmd->addr, issue_flags);
case UBLK_IO_FETCH_REQ:
- /* UBLK_IO_FETCH_REQ is only allowed before queue is setup */
- if (ublk_queue_ready(ubq)) {
- ret = -EBUSY;
- goto out;
- }
- /*
- * The io is being handled by server, so COMMIT_RQ is expected
- * instead of FETCH_REQ
- */
- if (io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_OWNED_BY_SRV)
- goto out;
-
- if (ublk_need_map_io(ubq)) {
- /*
- * FETCH_RQ has to provide IO buffer if NEED GET
- * DATA is not enabled
- */
- if (!ub_cmd->addr && !ublk_need_get_data(ubq))
- goto out;
- } else if (ub_cmd->addr) {
- /* User copy requires addr to be unset */
- ret = -EINVAL;
+ ret = ublk_fetch(cmd, ubq, io, ub_cmd->addr);
+ if (ret)
goto out;
- }
-
- ublk_fill_io_cmd(io, cmd, ub_cmd->addr);
- ublk_mark_io_ready(ub, ubq);
break;
case UBLK_IO_COMMIT_AND_FETCH_REQ:
req = blk_mq_tag_to_rq(ub->tag_set.tags[ub_cmd->q_id], tag);
--
2.47.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-16 3:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-16 3:54 [PATCH V2 0/8] ublk: simplify & improve IO canceling Ming Lei
2025-04-16 3:54 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-04-16 3:54 ` [PATCH V2 2/8] ublk: add ublk_force_abort_dev() Ming Lei
2025-04-16 3:54 ` [PATCH V2 3/8] ublk: rely on ->canceling for dealing with ublk_nosrv_dev_should_queue_io Ming Lei
2025-04-16 18:35 ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-16 3:54 ` [PATCH V2 4/8] ublk: move device reset into ublk_ch_release() Ming Lei
2025-04-16 19:02 ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-16 23:31 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-16 3:54 ` [PATCH V2 5/8] ublk: improve detection and handling of ublk server exit Ming Lei
2025-04-16 19:09 ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-16 3:54 ` [PATCH V2 6/8] ublk: remove __ublk_quiesce_dev() Ming Lei
2025-04-16 3:54 ` [PATCH V2 7/8] ublk: simplify aborting ublk request Ming Lei
2025-04-16 3:54 ` [PATCH V2 8/8] selftests: ublk: add generic_06 for covering fault inject Ming Lei
2025-04-16 18:45 ` [PATCH V2 0/8] ublk: simplify & improve IO canceling Jens Axboe
2025-04-17 0:03 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-17 1:33 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250416035444.99569-2-ming.lei@redhat.com \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=csander@purestorage.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox