From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>,
Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2 3/8] ublk: rely on ->canceling for dealing with ublk_nosrv_dev_should_queue_io
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:54:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250416035444.99569-4-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250416035444.99569-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
Now ublk deals with ublk_nosrv_dev_should_queue_io() by keeping request
queue as quiesced. This way is fragile because queue quiesce crosses syscalls
or process contexts.
Switch to rely on ubq->canceling for dealing with
ublk_nosrv_dev_should_queue_io(), because it has been used for this purpose
during io_uring context exiting, and it can be reused before recovering too.
In ublk_queue_rq(), the request will be added to requeue list without
kicking off requeue in case of ubq->canceling, and finally requests added in
requeue list will be dispatched from either ublk_stop_dev() or
ublk_ctrl_end_recovery().
Meantime we have to move reset of ubq->canceling from ublk_ctrl_start_recovery()
to ublk_ctrl_end_recovery(), when IO handling can be recovered completely.
Then blk_mq_quiesce_queue() and blk_mq_unquiesce_queue() are always used
in same context.
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index e1b4db2f8a56..a479969fd77e 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -1734,13 +1734,19 @@ static void ublk_wait_tagset_rqs_idle(struct ublk_device *ub)
static void __ublk_quiesce_dev(struct ublk_device *ub)
{
+ int i;
+
pr_devel("%s: quiesce ub: dev_id %d state %s\n",
__func__, ub->dev_info.dev_id,
ub->dev_info.state == UBLK_S_DEV_LIVE ?
"LIVE" : "QUIESCED");
blk_mq_quiesce_queue(ub->ub_disk->queue);
+ /* mark every queue as canceling */
+ for (i = 0; i < ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues; i++)
+ ublk_get_queue(ub, i)->canceling = true;
ublk_wait_tagset_rqs_idle(ub);
ub->dev_info.state = UBLK_S_DEV_QUIESCED;
+ blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(ub->ub_disk->queue);
}
static void ublk_force_abort_dev(struct ublk_device *ub)
@@ -2961,7 +2967,6 @@ static void ublk_queue_reinit(struct ublk_device *ub, struct ublk_queue *ubq)
/* We have to reset it to NULL, otherwise ub won't accept new FETCH_REQ */
ubq->ubq_daemon = NULL;
ubq->timeout = false;
- ubq->canceling = false;
for (i = 0; i < ubq->q_depth; i++) {
struct ublk_io *io = &ubq->ios[i];
@@ -3048,20 +3053,18 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_end_recovery(struct ublk_device *ub,
pr_devel("%s: new ublksrv_pid %d, dev id %d\n",
__func__, ublksrv_pid, header->dev_id);
- if (ublk_nosrv_dev_should_queue_io(ub)) {
- ub->dev_info.state = UBLK_S_DEV_LIVE;
- blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(ub->ub_disk->queue);
- pr_devel("%s: queue unquiesced, dev id %d.\n",
- __func__, header->dev_id);
- blk_mq_kick_requeue_list(ub->ub_disk->queue);
- } else {
- blk_mq_quiesce_queue(ub->ub_disk->queue);
- ub->dev_info.state = UBLK_S_DEV_LIVE;
- for (i = 0; i < ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues; i++) {
- ublk_get_queue(ub, i)->fail_io = false;
- }
- blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(ub->ub_disk->queue);
+ blk_mq_quiesce_queue(ub->ub_disk->queue);
+ ub->dev_info.state = UBLK_S_DEV_LIVE;
+ for (i = 0; i < ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues; i++) {
+ struct ublk_queue *ubq = ublk_get_queue(ub, i);
+
+ ubq->canceling = false;
+ ubq->fail_io = false;
}
+ blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(ub->ub_disk->queue);
+ pr_devel("%s: queue unquiesced, dev id %d.\n",
+ __func__, header->dev_id);
+ blk_mq_kick_requeue_list(ub->ub_disk->queue);
ret = 0;
out_unlock:
--
2.47.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-16 3:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-16 3:54 [PATCH V2 0/8] ublk: simplify & improve IO canceling Ming Lei
2025-04-16 3:54 ` [PATCH V2 1/8] ublk: properly serialize all FETCH_REQs Ming Lei
2025-04-16 3:54 ` [PATCH V2 2/8] ublk: add ublk_force_abort_dev() Ming Lei
2025-04-16 3:54 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-04-16 18:35 ` [PATCH V2 3/8] ublk: rely on ->canceling for dealing with ublk_nosrv_dev_should_queue_io Uday Shankar
2025-04-16 3:54 ` [PATCH V2 4/8] ublk: move device reset into ublk_ch_release() Ming Lei
2025-04-16 19:02 ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-16 23:31 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-16 3:54 ` [PATCH V2 5/8] ublk: improve detection and handling of ublk server exit Ming Lei
2025-04-16 19:09 ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-16 3:54 ` [PATCH V2 6/8] ublk: remove __ublk_quiesce_dev() Ming Lei
2025-04-16 3:54 ` [PATCH V2 7/8] ublk: simplify aborting ublk request Ming Lei
2025-04-16 3:54 ` [PATCH V2 8/8] selftests: ublk: add generic_06 for covering fault inject Ming Lei
2025-04-16 18:45 ` [PATCH V2 0/8] ublk: simplify & improve IO canceling Jens Axboe
2025-04-17 0:03 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-17 1:33 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250416035444.99569-4-ming.lei@redhat.com \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=csander@purestorage.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox