From: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/8] ublk: don't log uring_cmd cmd_op in ublk_dispatch_req()
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2025 22:57:59 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250427045803.772972-5-csander@purestorage.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250427045803.772972-1-csander@purestorage.com>
cmd_op is either UBLK_U_IO_FETCH_REQ, UBLK_U_IO_COMMIT_AND_FETCH_REQ,
or UBLK_U_IO_NEED_GET_DATA. Which one isn't particularly interesting
is already recorded by the log line in __ublk_ch_uring_cmd().
Signed-off-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
---
drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 13 ++++++-------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index 4967a5d72029..01fc92051754 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -1159,12 +1159,12 @@ static void ublk_dispatch_req(struct ublk_queue *ubq,
{
int tag = req->tag;
struct ublk_io *io = &ubq->ios[tag];
unsigned int mapped_bytes;
- pr_devel("%s: complete: op %d, qid %d tag %d io_flags %x addr %llx\n",
- __func__, io->cmd->cmd_op, ubq->q_id, req->tag, io->flags,
+ pr_devel("%s: complete: qid %d tag %d io_flags %x addr %llx\n",
+ __func__, ubq->q_id, req->tag, io->flags,
ublk_get_iod(ubq, req->tag)->addr);
/*
* Task is exiting if either:
*
@@ -1185,13 +1185,12 @@ static void ublk_dispatch_req(struct ublk_queue *ubq,
* so immediately pass UBLK_IO_RES_NEED_GET_DATA to ublksrv
* and notify it.
*/
if (!(io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_NEED_GET_DATA)) {
io->flags |= UBLK_IO_FLAG_NEED_GET_DATA;
- pr_devel("%s: need get data. op %d, qid %d tag %d io_flags %x\n",
- __func__, io->cmd->cmd_op, ubq->q_id,
- req->tag, io->flags);
+ pr_devel("%s: need get data. qid %d tag %d io_flags %x\n",
+ __func__, ubq->q_id, req->tag, io->flags);
ublk_complete_io_cmd(io, UBLK_IO_RES_NEED_GET_DATA,
issue_flags);
return;
}
/*
@@ -1200,12 +1199,12 @@ static void ublk_dispatch_req(struct ublk_queue *ubq,
* do the copy work.
*/
io->flags &= ~UBLK_IO_FLAG_NEED_GET_DATA;
/* update iod->addr because ublksrv may have passed a new io buffer */
ublk_get_iod(ubq, req->tag)->addr = io->addr;
- pr_devel("%s: update iod->addr: op %d, qid %d tag %d io_flags %x addr %llx\n",
- __func__, io->cmd->cmd_op, ubq->q_id, req->tag, io->flags,
+ pr_devel("%s: update iod->addr: qid %d tag %d io_flags %x addr %llx\n",
+ __func__, ubq->q_id, req->tag, io->flags,
ublk_get_iod(ubq, req->tag)->addr);
}
mapped_bytes = ublk_map_io(ubq, req, io);
--
2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-27 4:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-27 4:57 [PATCH 0/8] ublk: simplify NEED_GET_DATA handling and request lookup Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-27 4:57 ` [PATCH 1/8] ublk: factor out ublk_commit_and_fetch Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-27 4:57 ` [PATCH 2/8] ublk: fix "immepdately" typo in comment Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-27 12:58 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-27 4:57 ` [PATCH 3/8] ublk: remove misleading "ubq" in "ubq_complete_io_cmd()" Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-27 13:01 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-27 4:57 ` Caleb Sander Mateos [this message]
2025-04-27 13:03 ` [PATCH 4/8] ublk: don't log uring_cmd cmd_op in ublk_dispatch_req() Ming Lei
2025-04-27 4:58 ` [PATCH 5/8] ublk: factor out ublk_start_io() helper Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-27 13:05 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-28 14:28 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-28 15:12 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-29 4:05 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-29 14:55 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-30 22:44 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-27 4:58 ` [PATCH 6/8] ublk: don't call ublk_dispatch_req() for NEED_GET_DATA Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-27 13:10 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-27 4:58 ` [PATCH 7/8] ublk: check UBLK_IO_FLAG_OWNED_BY_SRV in ublk_abort_queue() Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-27 13:13 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-27 4:58 ` [PATCH 8/8] ublk: store request pointer in ublk_io Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-27 13:25 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250427045803.772972-5-csander@purestorage.com \
--to=csander@purestorage.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox