From: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
Subject: [PATCH 8/8] ublk: store request pointer in ublk_io
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2025 22:58:03 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250427045803.772972-9-csander@purestorage.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250427045803.772972-1-csander@purestorage.com>
A ublk_io is converted to a request in several places in the I/O path by
looking up the (qid, tag) on the ublk device's tagset. This involves a
bunch of pointer dereferences and a bounds check of the tag.
To make this conversion cheaper, store the request pointer in ublk_io.
Overlap this storage with the io_uring_cmd pointer. This is safe because
the io_uring_cmd pointer is only valid if UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE is set on
the ublk_io, the request pointer is valid if UBLK_IO_FLAG_OWNED_BY_SRV,
and these flags are mutually exclusive.
Suggested-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
---
drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index 2296fa677d0d..c69c234adb4e 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -140,11 +140,16 @@ struct ublk_io {
/* userspace buffer address from io cmd */
__u64 addr;
unsigned int flags;
int res;
- struct io_uring_cmd *cmd;
+ union {
+ /* valid if UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE is set */
+ struct io_uring_cmd *cmd;
+ /* valid if UBLK_IO_FLAG_OWNED_BY_SRV is set */
+ struct request *req;
+ };
};
struct ublk_queue {
int q_id;
int q_depth;
@@ -1123,24 +1128,29 @@ static void ublk_complete_rq(struct kref *ref)
struct request *req = blk_mq_rq_from_pdu(data);
__ublk_complete_rq(req);
}
-static void ublk_complete_io_cmd(struct ublk_io *io, int res,
- unsigned issue_flags)
+static void ublk_complete_io_cmd(struct ublk_io *io, struct request *req,
+ int res, unsigned issue_flags)
{
+ /* read cmd first because req will overwrite it */
+ struct io_uring_cmd *cmd = io->cmd;
+
/* mark this cmd owned by ublksrv */
io->flags |= UBLK_IO_FLAG_OWNED_BY_SRV;
/*
* clear ACTIVE since we are done with this sqe/cmd slot
* We can only accept io cmd in case of being not active.
*/
io->flags &= ~UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE;
+ io->req = req;
+
/* tell ublksrv one io request is coming */
- io_uring_cmd_done(io->cmd, res, 0, issue_flags);
+ io_uring_cmd_done(cmd, res, 0, issue_flags);
}
#define UBLK_REQUEUE_DELAY_MS 3
static inline void __ublk_abort_rq(struct ublk_queue *ubq,
@@ -1213,17 +1223,17 @@ static void ublk_dispatch_req(struct ublk_queue *ubq,
* and notify it.
*/
io->flags |= UBLK_IO_FLAG_NEED_GET_DATA;
pr_devel("%s: need get data. qid %d tag %d io_flags %x\n",
__func__, ubq->q_id, req->tag, io->flags);
- ublk_complete_io_cmd(io, UBLK_IO_RES_NEED_GET_DATA,
+ ublk_complete_io_cmd(io, req, UBLK_IO_RES_NEED_GET_DATA,
issue_flags);
return;
}
ublk_start_io(ubq, req, io);
- ublk_complete_io_cmd(io, UBLK_IO_RES_OK, issue_flags);
+ ublk_complete_io_cmd(io, req, UBLK_IO_RES_OK, issue_flags);
}
static void ublk_cmd_tw_cb(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
unsigned int issue_flags)
{
@@ -1607,16 +1617,12 @@ static void ublk_abort_queue(struct ublk_device *ub, struct ublk_queue *ubq)
int i;
for (i = 0; i < ubq->q_depth; i++) {
struct ublk_io *io = &ubq->ios[i];
- if (io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_OWNED_BY_SRV) {
- struct request *rq;
-
- rq = blk_mq_tag_to_rq(ub->tag_set.tags[ubq->q_id], i);
- __ublk_fail_req(ubq, io, rq);
- }
+ if (io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_OWNED_BY_SRV)
+ __ublk_fail_req(ubq, io, io->req);
}
}
/* Must be called when queue is frozen */
static void ublk_mark_queue_canceling(struct ublk_queue *ubq)
@@ -1986,16 +1992,16 @@ static int ublk_fetch(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, struct ublk_queue *ubq,
static int ublk_commit_and_fetch(const struct ublk_queue *ubq,
struct ublk_io *io, struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
const struct ublksrv_io_cmd *ub_cmd)
{
- struct blk_mq_tags *tags = ubq->dev->tag_set.tags[ub_cmd->q_id];
- struct request *req = blk_mq_tag_to_rq(tags, ub_cmd->tag);
+ struct request *req;
if (!(io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_OWNED_BY_SRV))
return -EINVAL;
+ req = io->req;
if (ublk_need_map_io(ubq)) {
/*
* COMMIT_AND_FETCH_REQ has to provide IO buffer if
* NEED GET DATA is not enabled or it is Read IO.
*/
@@ -2023,13 +2029,14 @@ static int ublk_commit_and_fetch(const struct ublk_queue *ubq,
ublk_put_req_ref(ubq, req);
return 0;
}
-static void ublk_get_data(struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct ublk_io *io,
- struct request *req)
+static void ublk_get_data(struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct ublk_io *io)
{
+ struct request *req = io->req;
+
/*
* We have handled UBLK_IO_NEED_GET_DATA command,
* so clear UBLK_IO_FLAG_NEED_GET_DATA now and just
* do the copy work.
*/
@@ -2051,11 +2058,10 @@ static int __ublk_ch_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
struct ublk_queue *ubq;
struct ublk_io *io;
u32 cmd_op = cmd->cmd_op;
unsigned tag = ub_cmd->tag;
int ret = -EINVAL;
- struct request *req;
pr_devel("%s: received: cmd op %d queue %d tag %d result %d\n",
__func__, cmd->cmd_op, ub_cmd->q_id, tag,
ub_cmd->result);
@@ -2107,12 +2113,11 @@ static int __ublk_ch_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
break;
case UBLK_IO_NEED_GET_DATA:
if (!(io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_OWNED_BY_SRV))
goto out;
io->addr = ub_cmd->addr;
- req = blk_mq_tag_to_rq(ub->tag_set.tags[ub_cmd->q_id], tag);
- ublk_get_data(ubq, io, req);
+ ublk_get_data(ubq, io);
return UBLK_IO_RES_OK;
default:
goto out;
}
ublk_prep_cancel(cmd, issue_flags, ubq, tag);
--
2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-27 4:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-27 4:57 [PATCH 0/8] ublk: simplify NEED_GET_DATA handling and request lookup Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-27 4:57 ` [PATCH 1/8] ublk: factor out ublk_commit_and_fetch Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-27 4:57 ` [PATCH 2/8] ublk: fix "immepdately" typo in comment Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-27 12:58 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-27 4:57 ` [PATCH 3/8] ublk: remove misleading "ubq" in "ubq_complete_io_cmd()" Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-27 13:01 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-27 4:57 ` [PATCH 4/8] ublk: don't log uring_cmd cmd_op in ublk_dispatch_req() Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-27 13:03 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-27 4:58 ` [PATCH 5/8] ublk: factor out ublk_start_io() helper Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-27 13:05 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-28 14:28 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-28 15:12 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-29 4:05 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-29 14:55 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-30 22:44 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-27 4:58 ` [PATCH 6/8] ublk: don't call ublk_dispatch_req() for NEED_GET_DATA Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-27 13:10 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-27 4:58 ` [PATCH 7/8] ublk: check UBLK_IO_FLAG_OWNED_BY_SRV in ublk_abort_queue() Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-27 13:13 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-27 4:58 ` Caleb Sander Mateos [this message]
2025-04-27 13:25 ` [PATCH 8/8] ublk: store request pointer in ublk_io Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250427045803.772972-9-csander@purestorage.com \
--to=csander@purestorage.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox