public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>,
	Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6.15 3/3] ublk: enhance check for register/unregister io buffer command
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 21:49:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250427134932.1480893-4-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250427134932.1480893-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>

The simple check of UBLK_IO_FLAG_OWNED_BY_SRV can avoid incorrect
register/unregister io buffer easily, so check it before calling
starting to register/un-register io buffer.

Also only allow io buffer register/unregister uring_cmd in case of
UBLK_F_SUPPORT_ZERO_COPY.

Also mark argument 'ublk_queue *' of ublk_register_io_buf as const.

Fixes: 1f6540e2aabb ("ublk: zc register/unregister bvec")
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index 0a3a3c64316d..c624d8f653ae 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ struct ublk_params_header {
 static void ublk_stop_dev_unlocked(struct ublk_device *ub);
 static void ublk_abort_queue(struct ublk_device *ub, struct ublk_queue *ubq);
 static inline struct request *__ublk_check_and_get_req(struct ublk_device *ub,
-		struct ublk_queue *ubq, int tag, size_t offset);
+		const struct ublk_queue *ubq, int tag, size_t offset);
 static inline unsigned int ublk_req_build_flags(struct request *req);
 static inline struct ublksrv_io_desc *ublk_get_iod(struct ublk_queue *ubq,
 						   int tag);
@@ -1949,13 +1949,20 @@ static void ublk_io_release(void *priv)
 }
 
 static int ublk_register_io_buf(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
-				struct ublk_queue *ubq, unsigned int tag,
+				const struct ublk_queue *ubq, unsigned int tag,
 				unsigned int index, unsigned int issue_flags)
 {
 	struct ublk_device *ub = cmd->file->private_data;
+	const struct ublk_io *io = &ubq->ios[tag];
 	struct request *req;
 	int ret;
 
+	if (!ublk_support_zero_copy(ubq))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (!(io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_OWNED_BY_SRV))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	req = __ublk_check_and_get_req(ub, ubq, tag, 0);
 	if (!req)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -1971,8 +1978,17 @@ static int ublk_register_io_buf(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
 }
 
 static int ublk_unregister_io_buf(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
+				  const struct ublk_queue *ubq, unsigned int tag,
 				  unsigned int index, unsigned int issue_flags)
 {
+	const struct ublk_io *io = &ubq->ios[tag];
+
+	if (!ublk_support_zero_copy(ubq))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (!(io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_OWNED_BY_SRV))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	return io_buffer_unregister_bvec(cmd, index, issue_flags);
 }
 
@@ -2076,7 +2092,7 @@ static int __ublk_ch_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
 	case UBLK_IO_REGISTER_IO_BUF:
 		return ublk_register_io_buf(cmd, ubq, tag, ub_cmd->addr, issue_flags);
 	case UBLK_IO_UNREGISTER_IO_BUF:
-		return ublk_unregister_io_buf(cmd, ub_cmd->addr, issue_flags);
+		return ublk_unregister_io_buf(cmd, ubq, tag, ub_cmd->addr, issue_flags);
 	case UBLK_IO_FETCH_REQ:
 		ret = ublk_fetch(cmd, ubq, io, ub_cmd->addr);
 		if (ret)
@@ -2128,7 +2144,7 @@ static int __ublk_ch_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
 }
 
 static inline struct request *__ublk_check_and_get_req(struct ublk_device *ub,
-		struct ublk_queue *ubq, int tag, size_t offset)
+		const struct ublk_queue *ubq, int tag, size_t offset)
 {
 	struct request *req;
 
-- 
2.47.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-04-27 13:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-27 13:49 [PATCH v6.15 0/3] ublk: one selftest fix and two zero copy fixes Ming Lei
2025-04-27 13:49 ` [PATCH v6.15 1/3] selftests: ublk: fix UBLK_F_NEED_GET_DATA Ming Lei
2025-04-28 15:51   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-29  0:53     ` Ming Lei
2025-04-27 13:49 ` [PATCH v6.15 2/3] ublk: decouple zero copy from user copy Ming Lei
2025-04-28 16:01   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-29  0:55     ` Ming Lei
2025-04-29  1:36       ` Ming Lei
2025-04-29  1:38         ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-27 13:49 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-04-28 16:28   ` [PATCH v6.15 3/3] ublk: enhance check for register/unregister io buffer command Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-29  1:02     ` Ming Lei
2025-04-29  1:03       ` Caleb Sander Mateos

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250427134932.1480893-4-ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=csander@purestorage.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox