From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>,
Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6.15 3/3] ublk: enhance check for register/unregister io buffer command
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 21:49:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250427134932.1480893-4-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250427134932.1480893-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
The simple check of UBLK_IO_FLAG_OWNED_BY_SRV can avoid incorrect
register/unregister io buffer easily, so check it before calling
starting to register/un-register io buffer.
Also only allow io buffer register/unregister uring_cmd in case of
UBLK_F_SUPPORT_ZERO_COPY.
Also mark argument 'ublk_queue *' of ublk_register_io_buf as const.
Fixes: 1f6540e2aabb ("ublk: zc register/unregister bvec")
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index 0a3a3c64316d..c624d8f653ae 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ struct ublk_params_header {
static void ublk_stop_dev_unlocked(struct ublk_device *ub);
static void ublk_abort_queue(struct ublk_device *ub, struct ublk_queue *ubq);
static inline struct request *__ublk_check_and_get_req(struct ublk_device *ub,
- struct ublk_queue *ubq, int tag, size_t offset);
+ const struct ublk_queue *ubq, int tag, size_t offset);
static inline unsigned int ublk_req_build_flags(struct request *req);
static inline struct ublksrv_io_desc *ublk_get_iod(struct ublk_queue *ubq,
int tag);
@@ -1949,13 +1949,20 @@ static void ublk_io_release(void *priv)
}
static int ublk_register_io_buf(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
- struct ublk_queue *ubq, unsigned int tag,
+ const struct ublk_queue *ubq, unsigned int tag,
unsigned int index, unsigned int issue_flags)
{
struct ublk_device *ub = cmd->file->private_data;
+ const struct ublk_io *io = &ubq->ios[tag];
struct request *req;
int ret;
+ if (!ublk_support_zero_copy(ubq))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (!(io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_OWNED_BY_SRV))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
req = __ublk_check_and_get_req(ub, ubq, tag, 0);
if (!req)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -1971,8 +1978,17 @@ static int ublk_register_io_buf(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
}
static int ublk_unregister_io_buf(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
+ const struct ublk_queue *ubq, unsigned int tag,
unsigned int index, unsigned int issue_flags)
{
+ const struct ublk_io *io = &ubq->ios[tag];
+
+ if (!ublk_support_zero_copy(ubq))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (!(io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_OWNED_BY_SRV))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
return io_buffer_unregister_bvec(cmd, index, issue_flags);
}
@@ -2076,7 +2092,7 @@ static int __ublk_ch_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
case UBLK_IO_REGISTER_IO_BUF:
return ublk_register_io_buf(cmd, ubq, tag, ub_cmd->addr, issue_flags);
case UBLK_IO_UNREGISTER_IO_BUF:
- return ublk_unregister_io_buf(cmd, ub_cmd->addr, issue_flags);
+ return ublk_unregister_io_buf(cmd, ubq, tag, ub_cmd->addr, issue_flags);
case UBLK_IO_FETCH_REQ:
ret = ublk_fetch(cmd, ubq, io, ub_cmd->addr);
if (ret)
@@ -2128,7 +2144,7 @@ static int __ublk_ch_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
}
static inline struct request *__ublk_check_and_get_req(struct ublk_device *ub,
- struct ublk_queue *ubq, int tag, size_t offset)
+ const struct ublk_queue *ubq, int tag, size_t offset)
{
struct request *req;
--
2.47.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-27 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-27 13:49 [PATCH v6.15 0/3] ublk: one selftest fix and two zero copy fixes Ming Lei
2025-04-27 13:49 ` [PATCH v6.15 1/3] selftests: ublk: fix UBLK_F_NEED_GET_DATA Ming Lei
2025-04-28 15:51 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-29 0:53 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-27 13:49 ` [PATCH v6.15 2/3] ublk: decouple zero copy from user copy Ming Lei
2025-04-28 16:01 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-29 0:55 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-29 1:36 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-29 1:38 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-27 13:49 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-04-28 16:28 ` [PATCH v6.15 3/3] ublk: enhance check for register/unregister io buffer command Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-04-29 1:02 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-29 1:03 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250427134932.1480893-4-ming.lei@redhat.com \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=csander@purestorage.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox