linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
Cc: "stefanha@redhat.com" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"virtualization@lists.linux.dev" <virtualization@lists.linux.dev>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	"NBU-Contact-Li Rongqing (EXTERNAL)" <lirongqing@baidu.com>,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@nvidia.com>,
	"xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"jasowang@redhat.com" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>,
	Israel Rukshin <israelr@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] virtio_blk: Fix disk deletion hang on device surprise removal
Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 06:08:32 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250529060716-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CY8PR12MB71954B0FEBAC97F368EF1EBCDC66A@CY8PR12MB7195.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>

On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 09:57:51AM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> 
> 
> > From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2025 1:34 PM
> > 
> > On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 06:19:31AM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > > When the PCI device is surprise removed, requests may not complete the
> > > device as the VQ is marked as broken. Due to this, the disk deletion
> > > hangs.
> > >
> > > Fix it by aborting the requests when the VQ is broken.
> > >
> > > With this fix now fio completes swiftly.
> > > An alternative of IO timeout has been considered, however when the
> > > driver knows about unresponsive block device, swiftly clearing them
> > > enables users and upper layers to react quickly.
> > >
> > > Verified with multiple device unplug iterations with pending requests
> > > in virtio used ring and some pending with the device.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 43bb40c5b926 ("virtio_pci: Support surprise removal of virtio
> > > pci device")
> > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > > Reported-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
> > > Closes:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/virtualization/c45dd68698cd47238c55fb73ca9b474
> > > 1@baidu.com/
> > > Reviewed-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Israel Rukshin <israelr@nvidia.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
> > >
> > > ---
> > > v2->v3:
> > > - Addressed comments from Michael
> > > - updated comment for synchronizing with callbacks
> > >
> > > v1->v2:
> > > - Addressed comments from Stephan
> > > - fixed spelling to 'waiting'
> > > - Addressed comments from Michael
> > > - Dropped checking broken vq from queue_rq() and queue_rqs()
> > >   because it is checked in lower layer routines in virtio core
> > >
> > > v0->v1:
> > > - Fixed comments from Stefan to rename a cleanup function
> > > - Improved logic for handling any outstanding requests
> > >   in bio layer
> > > - improved cancel callback to sync with ongoing done()
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > Something else small to improve.
> > 
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 82
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 82 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> > > index 7cffea01d868..d37df878f4e9 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> > > @@ -1554,6 +1554,86 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device
> > *vdev)
> > >  	return err;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +static bool virtblk_request_cancel(struct request *rq, void *data)
> > 
> > it is more
> > 
> > virtblk_request_complete_broken_with_ioerr
> > 
> > and maybe a comment?
> > /*
> >  * If the vq is broken, device will not complete requests.
> >  * So we do it for the device.
> >  */
> > 
> Ok. will add.
> 
> > > +{
> > > +	struct virtblk_req *vbr = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(rq);
> > > +	struct virtio_blk *vblk = data;
> > > +	struct virtio_blk_vq *vq;
> > > +	unsigned long flags;
> > > +
> > > +	vq = &vblk->vqs[rq->mq_hctx->queue_num];
> > > +
> > > +	spin_lock_irqsave(&vq->lock, flags);
> > > +
> > > +	vbr->in_hdr.status = VIRTIO_BLK_S_IOERR;
> > > +	if (blk_mq_request_started(rq) && !blk_mq_request_completed(rq))
> > > +		blk_mq_complete_request(rq);
> > > +
> > > +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vq->lock, flags);
> > > +	return true;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void virtblk_broken_device_cleanup(struct virtio_blk *vblk)
> > 
> > and one goes okay what does it do exactly? cleanup device in a broken way?
> > turns out no, it cleans up a broken device.
> > And an overview would be good. Maybe, a small comment will help:
> > 
> Virtblk_cleanup_broken_device()?
> 
> Is that name ok?

better, I think.

> > /*
> >  * if the device is broken, it will not use any buffers and waiting
> >  * for that to happen is pointless. We'll do it in the driver,
> >  * completing all requests for the device.
> >  */
> >
> Will add it.
>  
> > 
> > > +{
> > > +	struct request_queue *q = vblk->disk->queue;
> > > +
> > > +	if (!virtqueue_is_broken(vblk->vqs[0].vq))
> > > +		return;
> > 
> > so one has to read it, and understand that we did not need to call it in the 1st
> > place on a non broken device.
> > Moving it to the caller would be cleaner.
> > 
> Ok. will move.
> > 
> > > +
> > > +	/* Start freezing the queue, so that new requests keeps waiting at
> > > +the
> > 
> > wrong style of comment for blk.
> > 
> > /* this is
> >  * net style
> >  */
> > 
> > /*
> >  * this is
> >  * rest of the linux style
> >  */
> > 
> Ok. will fix it.
> 
> > > +	 * door of bio_queue_enter(). We cannot fully freeze the queue
> > because
> > > +	 * freezed queue is an empty queue and there are pending requests,
> > > +so
> > 
> > a frozen queue
> > 
> Will fix it.
> 
> > > +	 * only start freezing it.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	blk_freeze_queue_start(q);
> > > +
> > > +	/* When quiescing completes, all ongoing dispatches have completed
> > > +	 * and no new dispatch will happen towards the driver.
> > > +	 * This ensures that later when cancel is attempted, then are not
> > 
> > they are not?
> > 
> Will fix this too.
> 
> > > +	 * getting processed by the queue_rq() or queue_rqs() handlers.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	blk_mq_quiesce_queue(q);
> > > +
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * Synchronize with any ongoing VQ callbacks that may have started
> > > +	 * before the VQs were marked as broken. Any outstanding requests
> > > +	 * will be completed by virtblk_request_cancel().
> > > +	 */
> > > +	virtio_synchronize_cbs(vblk->vdev);
> > > +
> > > +	/* At this point, no new requests can enter the queue_rq() and
> > > +	 * completion routine will not complete any new requests either for
> > the
> > > +	 * broken vq. Hence, it is safe to cancel all requests which are
> > > +	 * started.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(&vblk->tag_set, virtblk_request_cancel,
> > vblk);
> > > +	blk_mq_tagset_wait_completed_request(&vblk->tag_set);
> > > +
> > > +	/* All pending requests are cleaned up. Time to resume so that disk
> > > +	 * deletion can be smooth. Start the HW queues so that when queue
> > is
> > > +	 * unquiesced requests can again enter the driver.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	blk_mq_start_stopped_hw_queues(q, true);
> > > +
> > > +	/* Unquiescing will trigger dispatching any pending requests to the
> > > +	 * driver which has crossed bio_queue_enter() to the driver.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(q);
> > > +
> > > +	/* Wait for all pending dispatches to terminate which may have been
> > > +	 * initiated after unquiescing.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait(q);
> > > +
> > > +	/* Mark the disk dead so that once queue unfreeze, the requests
> > 
> > ... once we unfreeze the queue
> > 
> > 
> Ok.
> 
> > > +	 * waiting at the door of bio_queue_enter() can be aborted right
> > away.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	blk_mark_disk_dead(vblk->disk);
> > > +
> > > +	/* Unfreeze the queue so that any waiting requests will be aborted.
> > */
> > > +	blk_mq_unfreeze_queue_nomemrestore(q);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static void virtblk_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)  {
> > >  	struct virtio_blk *vblk = vdev->priv; @@ -1561,6 +1641,8 @@ static
> > > void virtblk_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > >  	/* Make sure no work handler is accessing the device. */
> > >  	flush_work(&vblk->config_work);
> > >
> > 
> > I prefer simply moving the test here:
> > 
> > 	if (virtqueue_is_broken(vblk->vqs[0].vq))
> > 		virtblk_broken_device_cleanup(vblk);
> > 
> > makes it much clearer what is going on, imho.
> > 
> No strong preference, some maintainers prefer the current way others the way you preferred.
> So will fix as you proposed here along with above fixes in v4.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> > 
> > >  	del_gendisk(vblk->disk);
> > >  	blk_mq_free_tag_set(&vblk->tag_set);
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.34.1


      reply	other threads:[~2025-05-29 10:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20250529061913.28868-1-parav@nvidia.com>
2025-05-29  8:03 ` [PATCH v3] virtio_blk: Fix disk deletion hang on device surprise removal Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-05-29  9:57   ` Parav Pandit
2025-05-29 10:08     ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250529060716-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=chaitanyak@nvidia.com \
    --cc=israelr@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lirongqing@baidu.com \
    --cc=mgurtovoy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=parav@nvidia.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).