From: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
Subject: [PATCH 8/8] ublk: remove ubq checks from ublk_{get,put}_req_ref()
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2025 15:40:11 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250606214011.2576398-9-csander@purestorage.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250606214011.2576398-1-csander@purestorage.com>
ublk_get_req_ref() and ublk_put_req_ref() currently call
ublk_need_req_ref(ubq) to check whether the ublk device features require
reference counting of its requests. However, all callers already know
that reference counting is required:
- __ublk_check_and_get_req() is only called from
ublk_check_and_get_req() if user copy is enabled, and from
ublk_register_io_buf() if zero copy is enabled
- ublk_io_release() is only called for requests registered by
ublk_register_io_buf(), which requires zero copy
- ublk_ch_read_iter() and ublk_ch_write_iter() only call
ublk_put_req_ref() if ublk_check_and_get_req() succeeded, which
requires user copy to be enabled
So drop the ublk_need_req_ref() check and the ubq argument in
ublk_get_req_ref() and ublk_put_req_ref().
Signed-off-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
---
drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 41 +++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index ec9e0fd21b0e..f9a6b2abfd20 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -690,33 +690,23 @@ static inline void ublk_init_req_ref(const struct ublk_queue *ubq,
refcount_set(&data->ref, UBLK_REFCOUNT_INIT);
data->buffers_registered = 0;
}
}
-static inline bool ublk_get_req_ref(const struct ublk_queue *ubq,
- struct request *req)
+static inline bool ublk_get_req_ref(struct request *req)
{
- if (ublk_need_req_ref(ubq)) {
- struct ublk_rq_data *data = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
-
- return refcount_inc_not_zero(&data->ref);
- }
+ struct ublk_rq_data *data = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
- return true;
+ return refcount_inc_not_zero(&data->ref);
}
-static inline void ublk_put_req_ref(const struct ublk_queue *ubq,
- struct request *req)
+static inline void ublk_put_req_ref(struct request *req)
{
- if (ublk_need_req_ref(ubq)) {
- struct ublk_rq_data *data = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
+ struct ublk_rq_data *data = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
- if (refcount_dec_and_test(&data->ref))
- __ublk_complete_rq(req);
- } else {
+ if (refcount_dec_and_test(&data->ref))
__ublk_complete_rq(req);
- }
}
static inline void ublk_sub_req_ref(struct request *req)
{
struct ublk_rq_data *data = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
@@ -2004,13 +1994,12 @@ static inline int ublk_set_auto_buf_reg(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd)
}
static void ublk_io_release(void *priv)
{
struct request *rq = priv;
- struct ublk_queue *ubq = rq->mq_hctx->driver_data;
- ublk_put_req_ref(ubq, rq);
+ ublk_put_req_ref(rq);
}
static int ublk_register_io_buf(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
const struct ublk_queue *ubq, unsigned int tag,
unsigned int index, unsigned int issue_flags)
@@ -2027,11 +2016,11 @@ static int ublk_register_io_buf(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
return -EINVAL;
ret = io_buffer_register_bvec(cmd, req, ublk_io_release, index,
issue_flags);
if (ret) {
- ublk_put_req_ref(ubq, req);
+ ublk_put_req_ref(req);
return ret;
}
return 0;
}
@@ -2303,11 +2292,11 @@ static inline struct request *__ublk_check_and_get_req(struct ublk_device *ub,
req = blk_mq_tag_to_rq(ub->tag_set.tags[ubq->q_id], tag);
if (!req)
return NULL;
- if (!ublk_get_req_ref(ubq, req))
+ if (!ublk_get_req_ref(req))
return NULL;
if (unlikely(!blk_mq_request_started(req) || req->tag != tag))
goto fail_put;
@@ -2317,11 +2306,11 @@ static inline struct request *__ublk_check_and_get_req(struct ublk_device *ub,
if (offset > blk_rq_bytes(req))
goto fail_put;
return req;
fail_put:
- ublk_put_req_ref(ubq, req);
+ ublk_put_req_ref(req);
return NULL;
}
static inline int ublk_ch_uring_cmd_local(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
unsigned int issue_flags)
@@ -2431,46 +2420,42 @@ static struct request *ublk_check_and_get_req(struct kiocb *iocb,
goto fail;
*off = buf_off;
return req;
fail:
- ublk_put_req_ref(ubq, req);
+ ublk_put_req_ref(req);
return ERR_PTR(-EACCES);
}
static ssize_t ublk_ch_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
{
- struct ublk_queue *ubq;
struct request *req;
size_t buf_off;
size_t ret;
req = ublk_check_and_get_req(iocb, to, &buf_off, ITER_DEST);
if (IS_ERR(req))
return PTR_ERR(req);
ret = ublk_copy_user_pages(req, buf_off, to, ITER_DEST);
- ubq = req->mq_hctx->driver_data;
- ublk_put_req_ref(ubq, req);
+ ublk_put_req_ref(req);
return ret;
}
static ssize_t ublk_ch_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
{
- struct ublk_queue *ubq;
struct request *req;
size_t buf_off;
size_t ret;
req = ublk_check_and_get_req(iocb, from, &buf_off, ITER_SOURCE);
if (IS_ERR(req))
return PTR_ERR(req);
ret = ublk_copy_user_pages(req, buf_off, from, ITER_SOURCE);
- ubq = req->mq_hctx->driver_data;
- ublk_put_req_ref(ubq, req);
+ ublk_put_req_ref(req);
return ret;
}
static const struct file_operations ublk_ch_fops = {
--
2.45.2
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-06 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-06 21:40 [PATCH 0/8] ublk: allow off-daemon zero-copy buffer registration Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-06-06 21:40 ` [PATCH 1/8] ublk: check cmd_op first Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-06-09 6:57 ` Ming Lei
2025-06-06 21:40 ` [PATCH 2/8] ublk: handle UBLK_IO_FETCH_REQ first Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-06-09 7:01 ` Ming Lei
2025-06-06 21:40 ` [PATCH 3/8] ublk: remove task variable from __ublk_ch_uring_cmd() Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-06-09 7:02 ` Ming Lei
2025-06-06 21:40 ` [PATCH 4/8] ublk: consolidate UBLK_IO_FLAG_{ACTIVE,OWNED_BY_SRV} checks Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-06-09 7:19 ` Ming Lei
2025-06-06 21:40 ` [PATCH 5/8] ublk: move ublk_prep_cancel() to case UBLK_IO_COMMIT_AND_FETCH_REQ Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-06-09 7:21 ` Ming Lei
2025-06-06 21:40 ` [PATCH 6/8] ublk: allow UBLK_IO_(UN)REGISTER_IO_BUF on any task Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-06-09 7:34 ` Ming Lei
2025-06-09 17:39 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-06-09 12:34 ` Ming Lei
2025-06-09 17:49 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-06-10 1:34 ` Ming Lei
2025-06-11 15:47 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-06-12 2:31 ` Ming Lei
2025-06-06 21:40 ` [PATCH 7/8] ublk: optimize UBLK_IO_REGISTER_IO_BUF on daemon task Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-06-09 9:02 ` Ming Lei
2025-06-09 17:14 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-06-10 1:22 ` Ming Lei
2025-06-11 15:36 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-06-12 4:25 ` Ming Lei
2025-06-06 21:40 ` Caleb Sander Mateos [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250606214011.2576398-9-csander@purestorage.com \
--to=csander@purestorage.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox