linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Wagner <wagi@kernel.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@atomlin.com>,
	 "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	 Costa Shulyupin <costa.shul@redhat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	 Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>,  Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	 Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	 Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, megaraidlinux.pdl@broadcom.com,
	 linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, storagedev@microchip.com,
	 virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
	GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@marvell.com,
	 Daniel Wagner <wagi@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v7 09/10] blk-mq: prevent offlining hk CPUs with associated online isolated CPUs
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2025 18:33:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250702-isolcpus-io-queues-v7-9-557aa7eacce4@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250702-isolcpus-io-queues-v7-0-557aa7eacce4@kernel.org>

When isolcpus=io_queue is enabled, and the last housekeeping CPU for a
given hctx goes offline, there would be no CPU left to handle I/O. To
prevent I/O stalls, prevent offlining housekeeping CPUs that are still
serving isolated CPUs.

When isolcpus=io_queue is enabled and the last housekeeping CPU
for a given hctx goes offline, no CPU would be left to handle I/O.
To prevent I/O stalls, disallow offlining housekeeping CPUs that are
still serving isolated CPUs.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <wagi@kernel.org>
---
 block/blk-mq.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 0c61492724d228736f975f1d8f195515603801b6..87240644f73ed0490a5459e042c68e0e168f727d 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -3681,6 +3681,43 @@ static bool blk_mq_hctx_has_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 	return data.has_rq;
 }
 
+static bool blk_mq_hctx_can_offline_hk_cpu(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
+					   unsigned int this_cpu)
+{
+	const struct cpumask *hk_mask = housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_IO_QUEUE);
+
+	for (int i = 0; i < hctx->nr_ctx; i++) {
+		struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx = hctx->ctxs[i];
+
+		if (ctx->cpu == this_cpu)
+			continue;
+
+		/*
+		 * Check if this context has at least one online
+		 * housekeeping CPU; in this case the hardware context is
+		 * usable.
+		 */
+		if (cpumask_test_cpu(ctx->cpu, hk_mask) &&
+		    cpu_online(ctx->cpu))
+			break;
+
+		/*
+		 * The context doesn't have any online housekeeping CPUs,
+		 * but there might be an online isolated CPU mapped to
+		 * it.
+		 */
+		if (cpu_is_offline(ctx->cpu))
+			continue;
+
+		pr_warn("%s: trying to offline hctx%d but there is still an online isolcpu CPU %d mapped to it\n",
+			hctx->queue->disk->disk_name,
+			hctx->queue_num, ctx->cpu);
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 static bool blk_mq_hctx_has_online_cpu(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 		unsigned int this_cpu)
 {
@@ -3712,6 +3749,11 @@ static int blk_mq_hctx_notify_offline(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
 	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = hlist_entry_safe(node,
 			struct blk_mq_hw_ctx, cpuhp_online);
 
+	if (housekeeping_enabled(HK_TYPE_IO_QUEUE)) {
+		if (!blk_mq_hctx_can_offline_hk_cpu(hctx, cpu))
+			return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	if (blk_mq_hctx_has_online_cpu(hctx, cpu))
 		return 0;
 

-- 
2.50.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-02 16:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-02 16:33 [PATCH v7 00/10] blk: honor isolcpus configuration Daniel Wagner
2025-07-02 16:33 ` [PATCH v7 01/10] lib/group_cpus: Add group_masks_cpus_evenly() Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03  6:18   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-09-03 12:36     ` Daniel Wagner
2025-07-11  8:28   ` John Garry
2025-09-03 12:42     ` Daniel Wagner
2025-07-02 16:33 ` [PATCH v7 02/10] genirq/affinity: Add cpumask to struct irq_affinity Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03  6:19   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-02 16:33 ` [PATCH v7 03/10] blk-mq: add blk_mq_{online|possible}_queue_affinity Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03  6:29   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-02 16:33 ` [PATCH v7 04/10] nvme-pci: use block layer helpers to constrain queue affinity Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03  6:29   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-02 16:33 ` [PATCH v7 05/10] scsi: Use " Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03  6:43   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-04  9:37     ` Daniel Wagner
2025-07-04 10:28       ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-04 12:30         ` Daniel Wagner
2025-07-02 16:33 ` [PATCH v7 06/10] virtio: blk/scsi: use " Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03  6:43   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-02 16:33 ` [PATCH v7 07/10] isolation: Introduce io_queue isolcpus type Daniel Wagner
2025-07-08  1:26   ` Aaron Tomlin
2025-07-02 16:33 ` [PATCH v7 08/10] blk-mq: use hk cpus only when isolcpus=io_queue is enabled Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03  6:58   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-04  9:21     ` Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03  9:01   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-04  9:00     ` Daniel Wagner
2025-07-07  5:42       ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-03 14:47   ` kernel test robot
2025-07-02 16:33 ` Daniel Wagner [this message]
2025-07-03  6:58   ` [PATCH v7 09/10] blk-mq: prevent offlining hk CPUs with associated online isolated CPUs Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-07  7:44   ` Ming Lei
2025-07-08  1:31     ` Aaron Tomlin
2025-07-08  1:23   ` Aaron Tomlin
2025-07-02 16:34 ` [PATCH v7 10/10] docs: add io_queue flag to isolcpus Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03  6:59   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-08  1:26   ` Aaron Tomlin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250702-isolcpus-io-queues-v7-9-557aa7eacce4@kernel.org \
    --to=wagi@kernel.org \
    --cc=GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@marvell.com \
    --cc=atomlin@atomlin.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=costa.shul@redhat.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llong@redhat.com \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=megaraidlinux.pdl@broadcom.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=storagedev@microchip.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).