From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Daniel Wagner <wagi@kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@atomlin.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Costa Shulyupin <costa.shul@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, megaraidlinux.pdl@broadcom.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, storagedev@microchip.com,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@marvell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 08/10] blk-mq: use hk cpus only when isolcpus=io_queue is enabled
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2025 07:42:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250707054227.GB28625@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <75aafd33-0aff-4cf7-872f-f110ed896213@flourine.local>
On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 11:00:56AM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> > I'm no expert on the housekeeping stuff, but why isn't the
> > housekeeping_enabled check done in housekeeping_cpumask directly so
> > that the drivers could use housekeeping_cpumask without a blk-mq
> > wrapper?
>
> Yes, housekeeping_cpumask will return cpu_possible_mask when housekeping
> is disabled. Though some drivers want cpu_online_mask instead. If all
> drivers would agree on one version of the mask it should allow to drop
> to these helpers (maybe we the houskeeping API needs to be extended then
> though)
Drivers don't get cpu hotplug notifications, so cpu_possible_mask is
the only valid answer right now. That could change if we ever implement
notifications to the drivers.
> This is also what Hannes brought up. If the number of supported hardware
> queues for a device is less than cpu_possible_mask, it really makes
> sense to distribute the hardware queues only between the online cpus. I
> think the only two drivers which are interested in the cpu_possible_mask
> are nvme-pci and virtio.
That's the only two drivers that get it right :(
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-07 5:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-02 16:33 [PATCH v7 00/10] blk: honor isolcpus configuration Daniel Wagner
2025-07-02 16:33 ` [PATCH v7 01/10] lib/group_cpus: Add group_masks_cpus_evenly() Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03 6:18 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-09-03 12:36 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-07-11 8:28 ` John Garry
2025-09-03 12:42 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-07-02 16:33 ` [PATCH v7 02/10] genirq/affinity: Add cpumask to struct irq_affinity Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03 6:19 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-02 16:33 ` [PATCH v7 03/10] blk-mq: add blk_mq_{online|possible}_queue_affinity Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03 6:29 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-02 16:33 ` [PATCH v7 04/10] nvme-pci: use block layer helpers to constrain queue affinity Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03 6:29 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-02 16:33 ` [PATCH v7 05/10] scsi: Use " Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03 6:43 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-04 9:37 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-07-04 10:28 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-04 12:30 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-07-02 16:33 ` [PATCH v7 06/10] virtio: blk/scsi: use " Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03 6:43 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-02 16:33 ` [PATCH v7 07/10] isolation: Introduce io_queue isolcpus type Daniel Wagner
2025-07-08 1:26 ` Aaron Tomlin
2025-07-02 16:33 ` [PATCH v7 08/10] blk-mq: use hk cpus only when isolcpus=io_queue is enabled Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03 6:58 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-04 9:21 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03 9:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-04 9:00 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-07-07 5:42 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-07-03 14:47 ` kernel test robot
2025-07-02 16:33 ` [PATCH v7 09/10] blk-mq: prevent offlining hk CPUs with associated online isolated CPUs Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03 6:58 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-07 7:44 ` Ming Lei
2025-07-08 1:31 ` Aaron Tomlin
2025-07-08 1:23 ` Aaron Tomlin
2025-07-02 16:34 ` [PATCH v7 10/10] docs: add io_queue flag to isolcpus Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03 6:59 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-08 1:26 ` Aaron Tomlin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250707054227.GB28625@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@marvell.com \
--cc=atomlin@atomlin.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=costa.shul@redhat.com \
--cc=dwagner@suse.de \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llong@redhat.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=megaraidlinux.pdl@broadcom.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=storagedev@microchip.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=wagi@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).