From: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, ming.lei@redhat.com, yukuai1@huaweicloud.com,
hch@lst.de, shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com, kch@nvidia.com,
gjoyce@ibm.com
Subject: [PATCHv3 1/3] block: skip q->rq_qos check in rq_qos_done_bio()
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 13:54:57 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250814082612.500845-2-nilay@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250814082612.500845-1-nilay@linux.ibm.com>
If a bio has BIO_QOS_THROTTLED or BIO_QOS_MERGED set,
it implicitly guarantees that q->rq_qos is present.
Avoid re-checking q->rq_qos in this case and call
__rq_qos_done_bio() directly as a minor optimization.
Suggested-by : Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
Signed-off-by: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
---
block/blk-rq-qos.h | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-rq-qos.h b/block/blk-rq-qos.h
index 39749f4066fb..28125fc49eff 100644
--- a/block/blk-rq-qos.h
+++ b/block/blk-rq-qos.h
@@ -142,8 +142,14 @@ static inline void rq_qos_done_bio(struct bio *bio)
bio->bi_bdev && (bio_flagged(bio, BIO_QOS_THROTTLED) ||
bio_flagged(bio, BIO_QOS_MERGED))) {
struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bio->bi_bdev);
- if (q->rq_qos)
- __rq_qos_done_bio(q->rq_qos, bio);
+
+ /*
+ * If a bio has BIO_QOS_xxx set, it implicitly implies that
+ * q->rq_qos is present. So, we skip re-checking q->rq_qos
+ * here as an extra optimization and directly call
+ * __rq_qos_done_bio().
+ */
+ __rq_qos_done_bio(q->rq_qos, bio);
}
}
--
2.50.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-14 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-14 8:24 [PATCHv3 0/3] block: blk-rq-qos: replace static key with atomic bitop Nilay Shroff
2025-08-14 8:24 ` Nilay Shroff [this message]
2025-08-14 8:59 ` [PATCHv3 1/3] block: skip q->rq_qos check in rq_qos_done_bio() Yu Kuai
2025-08-14 11:12 ` Ming Lei
2025-08-14 8:24 ` [PATCHv3 2/3] block: decrement block_rq_qos static key in rq_qos_del() Nilay Shroff
2025-08-14 9:14 ` Yu Kuai
2025-08-14 11:33 ` Ming Lei
2025-08-14 8:24 ` [PATCHv3 3/3] block: avoid cpu_hotplug_lock depedency on freeze_lock Nilay Shroff
2025-08-14 9:21 ` Yu Kuai
2025-08-14 12:44 ` Ming Lei
2025-08-14 12:57 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-08-14 13:38 ` Ming Lei
2025-08-14 14:31 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-08-15 0:13 ` Ming Lei
2025-08-15 1:04 ` Yu Kuai
2025-08-15 7:59 ` Ming Lei
2025-08-15 8:39 ` Yu Kuai
2025-08-15 9:43 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-08-15 13:24 ` Ming Lei
2025-08-15 18:33 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-08-16 1:01 ` Yu Kuai
2025-08-16 1:59 ` Ming Lei
2025-08-21 12:19 ` [PATCHv3 0/3] block: blk-rq-qos: replace static key with atomic bitop Nilay Shroff
2025-08-21 13:11 ` Jens Axboe
2025-08-21 13:11 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250814082612.500845-2-nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=gjoyce@ibm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
--cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).