Re: make block layer auto-PI deadlock safe v3

[Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>]

On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 08:03:57AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > This is 6.19 material.  That's just a heads up that you need a merge
> > (or rebase which I was hoping for as of the first round, but it's probably
> > too late now)
> 
> But why not generate it against the 6.19 tree then? As-is, I have to
> first resolve the conflict in that tree, then resolve it again when
> merging to for-next. Not a huge issue, just don't quite follow the logic
> behind generating it against block-6.18.

Mostly because I though you'd rebase when I did the first version and
then didn't really think about the base more after that.

Btw, we'll need the merge anyway for Keith's unaligned PI patch if we
end up adding that for 6.19.