public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>
To: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@nvidia.com>
Cc: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni <ckulkarnilinux@gmail.com>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>, "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] loop: respect REQ_NOWAIT for memory allocation
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 06:21:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251118052124.GA22100@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <67472833-fd71-42a7-ac32-26e1da30f3ad@nvidia.com>

On Sun, Nov 16, 2025 at 05:43:53AM +0000, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> On 11/15/25 19:50, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> > On 11/16/25 11:52, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> >>    6. Loop driver:
> >>     loop_queue_rq()
> >>      lo_rw_aio()
> >>       kmalloc_array(..., GFP_NOIO) <-- BLOCKS (REQ_NOWAIT violation)
> >>        -> Should use GFP_NOWAIT when rq->cmd_flags & REQ_NOWAIT
> > Same comment as for zloop. Re-read the code and see that loop_queue_rq() calls
> > loop_queue_work(). That function has a memory allocation that is already marked
> > with GFP_NOWAIT, and that this function does not directly execute lo_rw_aio() as
> > that is done from loop_workfn(), in the work item context.
> > So again, no blocking violation that I can see here.
> > As far as I can tell, this patch is not needed.
> >
> Thanks for pointing that out. Since REQ_NOWAIT is not valid in the
> workqueue, then REQ_NOWAIT flag needs to be cleared before
> handing it over to workqueue ? is that the right interpretation?

Having it cleared does seem useful as there is no need to skip blocking
operations.  I don't think it actually is required, just a lot more
efficient.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-11-18  5:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-16  2:52 [PATCH 1/2] loop: respect REQ_NOWAIT for memory allocation Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-16  2:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] zloop: " Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-16  3:44   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-11-16  3:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] loop: " Damien Le Moal
2025-11-16  5:43   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-16  6:26     ` Damien Le Moal
2025-11-18  1:52       ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-11-18  5:21     ` hch [this message]
2025-11-18 13:57       ` Jens Axboe
2025-11-19  0:39         ` Chaitanya Kulkarni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251118052124.GA22100@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=chaitanyak@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ckulkarnilinux@gmail.com \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox