From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D672424886E; Wed, 19 Nov 2025 11:07:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763550423; cv=none; b=JkRHebt+3+inqhX3p9//0C9TKmSwE6kpvSeTv3dsuRcBGWarxwwC4JIGubwyaTqWyUMYzR0878tLM+Sq0kaKSvwfhu5BtyGDmTbGgKH5UJLIXnI43YIKb4gtX+YfFTA5ADTGaidYvnvEvEhJamzC6BOAHs2PsmOYcvf+u0AvkpU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763550423; c=relaxed/simple; bh=S3zTVStBoLYGmYGmxZC0NIadrgUI21u3no3kP3JU4m0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=rnRgqSsT+gAP6+8Esa3te7RgPle+WiH8wurpm8bGslerzI8GD8CAjE37J2AqfNPsWVokE/LMH/ZwvPcjV41fxSUspTPQJHhOrkK83zxJz+uJhNNV4rrwK0epUfQ4gGokp9SzOEOiL/PmFlF9eGgEjU7qLa8bld+7csMrHzgYsjE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=V2oXOGb+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="V2oXOGb+" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8E385C19422; Wed, 19 Nov 2025 11:07:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1763550422; bh=S3zTVStBoLYGmYGmxZC0NIadrgUI21u3no3kP3JU4m0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=V2oXOGb+nSFmMH/C3fHQdKnLwI+dzInHFjDWDiM9Y2GgvnvftKQCcFuAyKUirvzps 9vh779mzu/HLXKFzPlOHSHr4efcZMbp2dHAa+G1OCa3KpqQ8Mk+4QRvgIrnuUGUgSW DjyECJHD1IL/sDvMXLtjOvlnxK2sIR+7MQkEHp6KZ6WQ/lBN8KsQbS/8dQg+fSePBd q4LhLgHlFkt9y/fctoQ7oAXFSNR2oT4e82MLX5bUr3kW9+JBNzbs05xXjsDsVFGgrj C4RWQYbz0re4CmM/BortuOyD27zlQtDCtH91QfGy/mkvkxw/nDGn6fBeRfCpiP5+Nl RFNNSmrETZ2vA== Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 13:06:55 +0200 From: Leon Romanovsky To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Jens Axboe , Keith Busch , Sagi Grimberg , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Chaitanya Kulkarni Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] nvme-pci: Use size_t for length fields to handle larger sizes Message-ID: <20251119110655.GB13783@unreal> References: <20251117-nvme-phys-types-v2-0-c75a60a2c468@nvidia.com> <20251117-nvme-phys-types-v2-1-c75a60a2c468@nvidia.com> <20251118050311.GA21569@lst.de> <20251119095516.GA13783@unreal> <20251119101048.GA26266@lst.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251119101048.GA26266@lst.de> On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 11:10:48AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 11:55:16AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > So what is the resolution? Should I drop this patch or not? > > I think it should be dropped. I don't think having to use one 96-bit > structure per 4GB worth of memory should be a deal breaker. No problem, will drop.