From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What should we do about the nvme atomics mess?
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 13:56:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260126125606.GC28035@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c5ad03b7-b5e3-41ee-977c-f0ef1002bf1c@oracle.com>
On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 10:16:53AM +0000, John Garry wrote:
>> - Recommending other vendors adopt the same reporting model, and
>> - As it was already proposed earlier, updating the Linux NVMe kernel driver to disregard
>> atomic write support for devices that report a non-zero AWUPF at the controller level.
>
> Yeah, we can just stop using AWUPF always. Or can further consider my
> proposed change to allow AWUPF to be used based on an opt-in, below.
>
> Keith, Christoph, Any further thoughts on this?
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20250820150220.1923826-1-john.g.garry@oracle.com/
I'd love to drop support for the controller-level AWUPF.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-26 12:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-07 14:18 What should we do about the nvme atomics mess? Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-07 14:24 ` Keith Busch
2025-07-07 15:26 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-07 15:56 ` Keith Busch
2025-07-07 23:35 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-07-08 9:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-08 15:19 ` Keith Busch
2025-07-08 1:27 ` Ming Lei
2025-07-08 2:27 ` Keith Busch
2025-07-08 2:46 ` Ming Lei
2025-07-08 2:56 ` Keith Busch
2025-07-08 3:17 ` Ming Lei
2025-07-08 9:38 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-07-08 9:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-08 10:08 ` John Garry
2025-07-09 7:51 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-07-09 21:28 ` Keith Busch
2025-07-10 5:07 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-07-10 7:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-20 13:42 ` John Garry
2025-10-21 15:02 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-10-22 8:50 ` John Garry
2025-10-22 15:24 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-12-08 12:11 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-12-09 8:26 ` John Garry
2026-01-22 10:06 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-01-22 10:16 ` John Garry
2026-01-26 12:56 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-01-26 12:58 ` John Garry
2026-01-26 13:01 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260126125606.GC28035@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox