From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28AB533FE08; Tue, 27 Jan 2026 10:31:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769509895; cv=none; b=A8LNp97CUmwRfqNXBoq/uQZrkaLI8F7suq/gM1vZ8Mq4OilvoweVgAHWQWEsG2LKG1c5O3/UrQFxERJhZOH8aEDyqS3necWkdKlSF7KnLp1+IWqvxTOVmduoW/q7/95pNkay8wKF9jBmG9tufxqIaBULVgIdGmLFhifsu2kBNes= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769509895; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yez8CxCaJvQdm0pFsZYXYFvGPQwxl8sc40KXS7WLMao=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Rco23tuptvjxy5JHrU3kZgK5yts18VE1Xd7EPWIjABHFf+Cm9hvCaXMMgrXWXche/TUln6c9Y5lna+dUvqwEiln8bgVexKKb2YOs891heTnp4NiWzNIKDxeSrgbLh7hEOaumJLRp+06Cdo+MzOCzKprE/bhKe0YoKqsVhSvXYg8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=jCsabYyg; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="jCsabYyg" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BA25BC116C6; Tue, 27 Jan 2026 10:31:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1769509895; bh=yez8CxCaJvQdm0pFsZYXYFvGPQwxl8sc40KXS7WLMao=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=jCsabYyg1Yh0toV4raRWeB0w052zRrIQIPMTaAsVzG58wRJzE/U3nUnLpzCJLN2jY dKFHFv/Y97VUUIgUc5+0LfDfHoRCnTHkjHU5SSGTIgA42bqhDfUyr5YlSKqRls6g1Z E2dA1E62ZAjsLfu3getHhtKVtFBQlxrkW4Vn4mfiDetWqiellOrBpALD3bISUOwLVL 01SxuohvYEQ9bfSPvaDCzRdkF8D1MC1z2lxIUPU5OyfsrqF9jRom7FBm3L9u2GWM1I LIPNeZ8sde/d1d832ikbCUW8g1GztzNi3nMkpCiZcOdwStCLKGrmYwGHzwKeRBGdG4 SpM8Mh7BiJtsA== Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 11:31:30 +0100 From: Christian Brauner To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Jens Axboe , "Darrick J. Wong" , Carlos Maiolino , Qu Wenruo , Al Viro , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: block or iomap tree, was: Re: bounce buffer direct I/O when stable pages are required v2 Message-ID: <20260127-dezent-ungunsten-0cc7a56917ba@brauner> References: <20260119074425.4005867-1-hch@lst.de> <20260123-zuerst-viadukt-b61b8db7f1c5@brauner> <20260123141032.GA24964@lst.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260123141032.GA24964@lst.de> On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 03:10:32PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 01:24:08PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote: > > Applied to the vfs-7.0.iomap branch of the vfs/vfs.git tree. > > Patches in the vfs-7.0.iomap branch should appear in linux-next soon. > > Hmm, I have another minor revision in the making. This is mostly > spelling fixes, removing a duplicate page_folio call, adding a new > comment and adding symbolic constants for the max bvec_iter/bio sizes. > > I also have some other work that would conflict with this in the block > layer. > > What do you and Jens think of waiting for another quick respin and > merging it through the block tree or a shared branch in the block > tree? There really is nothing in the iomap branch that conflicts, I don't mind per se. I haven't pushed this into -next yet. We can also just wait for the next merge window given how close we're cutting it.