public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] block: introduce bdev_rot()
@ 2026-01-30  6:28 Damien Le Moal
  2026-01-30  8:35 ` Johannes Thumshirn
  2026-01-30 15:12 ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Damien Le Moal @ 2026-01-30  6:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe, linux-block

Introduce the helper function bdev_rot() to test if a block device is a
rotational one. The existing function bdev_nonrot() which tests for the
opposite condition is redefined using this new helper.
This avoids the double negation (operator and name) that appears when
testing if a block device is a rotational device, thus making the code a
little easier to read.

Call sites of bdev_nonrot() in the block layer are updated to use this
new helper.  Remaining users in other subsystems are left unchanged for
now.

Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
---
 block/ioctl.c                   | 2 +-
 drivers/block/loop.c            | 2 +-
 drivers/nvme/target/admin-cmd.c | 4 ++--
 include/linux/blkdev.h          | 7 ++++++-
 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/ioctl.c b/block/ioctl.c
index 344478348a54..fd48f82f9f03 100644
--- a/block/ioctl.c
+++ b/block/ioctl.c
@@ -692,7 +692,7 @@ static int blkdev_common_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, blk_mode_t mode,
 				    queue_max_sectors(bdev_get_queue(bdev)));
 		return put_ushort(argp, max_sectors);
 	case BLKROTATIONAL:
-		return put_ushort(argp, !bdev_nonrot(bdev));
+		return put_ushort(argp, bdev_rot(bdev));
 	case BLKRASET:
 	case BLKFRASET:
 		if(!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index bd59c0e9508b..ae3039584045 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -969,7 +969,7 @@ static void loop_update_limits(struct loop_device *lo, struct queue_limits *lim,
 	lim->features &= ~(BLK_FEAT_WRITE_CACHE | BLK_FEAT_ROTATIONAL);
 	if (file->f_op->fsync && !(lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_READ_ONLY))
 		lim->features |= BLK_FEAT_WRITE_CACHE;
-	if (backing_bdev && !bdev_nonrot(backing_bdev))
+	if (backing_bdev && bdev_rot(backing_bdev))
 		lim->features |= BLK_FEAT_ROTATIONAL;
 	lim->max_hw_discard_sectors = max_discard_sectors;
 	lim->max_write_zeroes_sectors = max_discard_sectors;
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/admin-cmd.c b/drivers/nvme/target/admin-cmd.c
index 3da31bb1183e..5e366502fb75 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/target/admin-cmd.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/target/admin-cmd.c
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ static void nvmet_execute_get_log_page_rmi(struct nvmet_req *req)
 	if (status)
 		goto out;
 
-	if (!req->ns->bdev || bdev_nonrot(req->ns->bdev)) {
+	if (!req->ns->bdev || !bdev_rot(req->ns->bdev)) {
 		status = NVME_SC_INVALID_FIELD | NVME_STATUS_DNR;
 		goto out;
 	}
@@ -1084,7 +1084,7 @@ static void nvmet_execute_id_cs_indep(struct nvmet_req *req)
 	id->nmic = NVME_NS_NMIC_SHARED;
 	if (req->ns->readonly)
 		id->nsattr |= NVME_NS_ATTR_RO;
-	if (req->ns->bdev && !bdev_nonrot(req->ns->bdev))
+	if (req->ns->bdev && bdev_rot(req->ns->bdev))
 		id->nsfeat |= NVME_NS_ROTATIONAL;
 	/*
 	 * We need flush command to flush the file's metadata,
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index 1e5b5547929f..2ae4c45e4959 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -1461,9 +1461,14 @@ bdev_write_zeroes_unmap_sectors(struct block_device *bdev)
 	return bdev_limits(bdev)->max_wzeroes_unmap_sectors;
 }
 
+static inline bool bdev_rot(struct block_device *bdev)
+{
+	return blk_queue_rot(bdev_get_queue(bdev));
+}
+
 static inline bool bdev_nonrot(struct block_device *bdev)
 {
-	return !blk_queue_rot(bdev_get_queue(bdev));
+	return !bdev_rot(bdev);
 }
 
 static inline bool bdev_synchronous(struct block_device *bdev)
-- 
2.52.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] block: introduce bdev_rot()
  2026-01-30  6:28 [PATCH] block: introduce bdev_rot() Damien Le Moal
@ 2026-01-30  8:35 ` Johannes Thumshirn
  2026-01-30 15:12 ` Jens Axboe
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Thumshirn @ 2026-01-30  8:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Damien Le Moal, Jens Axboe, linux-block@vger.kernel.org

Looks good,

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] block: introduce bdev_rot()
  2026-01-30  6:28 [PATCH] block: introduce bdev_rot() Damien Le Moal
  2026-01-30  8:35 ` Johannes Thumshirn
@ 2026-01-30 15:12 ` Jens Axboe
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2026-01-30 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-block, Damien Le Moal


On Fri, 30 Jan 2026 15:28:45 +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> Introduce the helper function bdev_rot() to test if a block device is a
> rotational one. The existing function bdev_nonrot() which tests for the
> opposite condition is redefined using this new helper.
> This avoids the double negation (operator and name) that appears when
> testing if a block device is a rotational device, thus making the code a
> little easier to read.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] block: introduce bdev_rot()
      commit: da562d92e6755c00cd67845a8dbfb908dac51a9c

Best regards,
-- 
Jens Axboe




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-01-30 15:12 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-01-30  6:28 [PATCH] block: introduce bdev_rot() Damien Le Moal
2026-01-30  8:35 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2026-01-30 15:12 ` Jens Axboe

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox