From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sender-of-o55.zoho.eu (sender-of-o55.zoho.eu [136.143.169.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B58E93DC4BC for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2026 18:11:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=pass smtp.client-ip=136.143.169.55 ARC-Seal:i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773425466; cv=pass; b=XjAW9j+/43J4Myn8uWAAzgwvbq56fQUHZFlQN1MbyooqIW9u0pcsQvJYyLQaIWJnqTWKZHzjhNB+uMkoxI1HwhwKbCCdhhWIua/jA71Uh7c2YwsgjZd3NwP+chRq902wIlu6zv9mr1lFHvQcO2XGIM4A8xY3kmWjvOd0H/j86y4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773425466; c=relaxed/simple; bh=djYHWh5797V5FFMCTTT8D+SX719WAsRUsR06ws370Oc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=GnkhQ0Wxwq3NTE/IlbKPJahx6FvUrKif9w14XwCcNE2AgL5Pp6OSkK+KQTBCa3R2Nk5ffrWbRGYM8hdFUmDr9TISnnFPu+pe3+oqEVmjnJ3KoF9PymN4kxMvc2kD9fLbVAotLSGYw1V1u0NF6igXVcqg6lt0W8oodNtQPMQvBZ8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=2; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=objecting.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=objecting.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=objecting.org header.i=objecting@objecting.org header.b=Jt5DlSnW; arc=pass smtp.client-ip=136.143.169.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=objecting.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=objecting.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=objecting.org header.i=objecting@objecting.org header.b="Jt5DlSnW" ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1773425445; cv=none; d=zohomail.eu; s=zohoarc; b=Ft5wvn2YlO3FAA0HXu8fqLV/PKOpVGq8xYFS2CELi38tgzhdWj3jZkwMpDP3hV0djfPPUWSE4fe4qXjPsi+yIJ4g+AzprpOmidcBFl3U017CEksm/G+RGLmWuyeBgf8qeKyDAYxL+QicqCHuTVj3GNdferxR86FwTn3glVZxeZM= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.eu; s=zohoarc; t=1773425445; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:From:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=orO1a/zODaBIJYN0vC2FaQCr3Has8dtmh84CnFyWWEY=; b=Go1dqoRvaR+OZ3lec31+uCxNqQqinWKJvXQfnz+mhMxX6Aui1/BSmXtPz107iAzln4ulcjzvJ6xsT/QPdJr8G03MUV7RF/dVTwBKSZ/7zBXw8d8L3o7LIzGvZ/BRph8bl82ETl5n++w6zdNG55nSpxw/8xCV9dUNoxBNF05gbOk= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.eu; dkim=pass header.i=objecting.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=objecting@objecting.org; dmarc=pass header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1773425445; s=zmail; d=objecting.org; i=objecting@objecting.org; h=From:From:To:To:Cc:Cc:Subject:Subject:Date:Date:Message-Id:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Reply-To; bh=orO1a/zODaBIJYN0vC2FaQCr3Has8dtmh84CnFyWWEY=; b=Jt5DlSnWZ28ZzIRI/1ZhHQw9ejQNU9J7LYvKWu7l8sRxi+i4/ygSkb7pzcqYNDox hAo78DdShsF8+64TXP7ag3RJ0qkveNYEIM3hjA8n+ZUDvAaKAtdGk7Ev4NYS75WDOhY EG12+pShTYgfl4R0lYhrPTZ+18vUKpxmqgIlUrSM= Received: by mx.zoho.eu with SMTPS id 1773425443427459.1214546636411; Fri, 13 Mar 2026 19:10:43 +0100 (CET) From: Josh Law To: Andrew Morton , Alexander Viro Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Josh Law Subject: [PATCH 5/7] lib/iov_iter: account for iov_offset in iov_iter_gap_alignment() Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 18:10:36 +0000 Message-Id: <20260313181038.30018-6-objecting@objecting.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20260313181038.30018-1-objecting@objecting.org> References: <20260313181038.30018-1-objecting@objecting.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ZohoMailClient: External When the block layer checks gap alignment constraints for a partially consumed iovec iterator — as can happen during large direct I/O submissions that get split across multiple bio's — iov_iter_gap_alignment() uses the raw iov_base and iov_len of the first segment without adjusting for iov_offset. This reports the alignment of already-consumed data rather than the remaining portion, which can cause the block layer to apply incorrect gap alignment restrictions. Found by comparing the first-segment handling in iov_iter_gap_alignment() against iov_iter_alignment_iovec(), which correctly applies iov_offset via its skip variable. Apply iov_offset to the base address and length of the first segment so that gap alignment reflects the actual remaining data. Signed-off-by: Josh Law --- lib/iov_iter.c | 12 +++++++----- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/iov_iter.c b/lib/iov_iter.c index 375512beefc5..18561108aa3a 100644 --- a/lib/iov_iter.c +++ b/lib/iov_iter.c @@ -883,14 +883,16 @@ unsigned long iov_iter_gap_alignment(const struct iov_iter *i) for (k = 0; k < i->nr_segs; k++) { const struct iovec *iov = iter_iov(i) + k; - if (iov->iov_len) { - unsigned long base = (unsigned long)iov->iov_base; + size_t skip = k ? 0 : i->iov_offset; + size_t len = iov->iov_len - skip; + if (len) { + unsigned long base = (unsigned long)iov->iov_base + skip; if (v) // if not the first one res |= base | v; // this start | previous end - v = base + iov->iov_len; - if (size <= iov->iov_len) + v = base + len; + if (size <= len) break; - size -= iov->iov_len; + size -= len; } } return res; -- 2.34.1