public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: "Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
	"Damien Le Moal" <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
	"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
	"Christoph Böhmwalder" <christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com>,
	"Philipp Reisner" <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>,
	"Lars Ellenberg" <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>,
	"Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/26] drbd: Make the lock context annotations compatible with Clang
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 15:18:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260326141814.GC16166@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260325214518.2854494-17-bvanassche@acm.org>

On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 02:44:57PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Clang performs more strict checking of lock context annotations than
> sparse. This patch makes the DRBD lock context annotations compatible
> with Clang and enables lock context analysis in the Makefile.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Böhmwalder <christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
> ---
>  drivers/block/drbd/Makefile        |  3 +
>  drivers/block/drbd/drbd_bitmap.c   | 26 ++++++---
>  drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h      | 88 ++++++++++++++++++------------
>  drivers/block/drbd/drbd_main.c     | 40 ++++++++++----
>  drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c       |  5 +-
>  drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c | 31 ++++++++---
>  drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c      |  3 +
>  drivers/block/drbd/drbd_state.c    |  2 +
>  drivers/block/drbd/drbd_state.h    |  4 --
>  drivers/block/drbd/drbd_worker.c   |  6 +-
>  10 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/Makefile b/drivers/block/drbd/Makefile
> index 67a8b352a1d5..8eaa83a7592b 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/drbd/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/block/drbd/Makefile
> @@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
>  # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +
> +CONTEXT_ANALYSIS := y
> +
>  drbd-y := drbd_buildtag.o drbd_bitmap.o drbd_proc.o
>  drbd-y += drbd_worker.o drbd_receiver.o drbd_req.o drbd_actlog.o
>  drbd-y += drbd_main.o drbd_strings.o drbd_nl.o
> diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_bitmap.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_bitmap.c
> index 65ea6ec66bfd..3c521f0dc9ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_bitmap.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_bitmap.c
> @@ -122,12 +122,16 @@ static void __bm_print_lock_info(struct drbd_device *device, const char *func)
>  }
>  
>  void drbd_bm_lock(struct drbd_device *device, char *why, enum bm_flag flags)
> +	__acquires(&device->bitmap->bm_change)
>  {
>  	struct drbd_bitmap *b = device->bitmap;
>  	int trylock_failed;
>  
>  	if (!b) {
>  		drbd_err(device, "FIXME no bitmap in drbd_bm_lock!?\n");
> +		/* Fake __acquire() to keep the compiler happy. */
> +		__acquire(&b->bm_change);
> +		__acquire(drbd_bitmap_lock);
>  		return;

This looks like an impossible to hit case with cargo cult code.  I'd
suggest to remove it instead.

Similarly please kill the trylock_faiuled code, which has weird
debugging that is strictly inferior to what lockdep already provides.

>  void drbd_bm_unlock(struct drbd_device *device)
> +	__releases(&device->bitmap->bm_change)
>  {
>  	struct drbd_bitmap *b = device->bitmap;
>  	if (!b) {
>  		drbd_err(device, "FIXME no bitmap in drbd_bm_unlock!?\n");
> +		/* Fake __release() to keep the compiler happy. */
> +		__release(&b->bm_change);
> +		__release(drbd_bitmap_lock);
>  		return;
>  	}

Same comment as above.

> +extern void drbd_uuid_set(struct drbd_device *device, int idx, u64 val);
> +extern void _drbd_uuid_set(struct drbd_device *device, int idx, u64 val);
> +extern void drbd_uuid_new_current(struct drbd_device *device);
> +extern void drbd_uuid_set_bm(struct drbd_device *device, u64 val);
> +extern void drbd_uuid_move_history(struct drbd_device *device);
> +extern void __drbd_uuid_set(struct drbd_device *device, int idx, u64 val);
> +extern void drbd_md_set_flag(struct drbd_device *device, int flags);
> +extern void drbd_md_clear_flag(struct drbd_device *device, int flags);

All these externs should go away.

In general this still mixes up way too many things.  Address one
lock/issue at a time, and write proper commit logs explain why a
given solution is taken.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-26 14:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-25 21:44 [PATCH v2 00/26] Enable lock context analysis Bart Van Assche
2026-03-25 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 01/26] block: Annotate the queue limits functions Bart Van Assche
2026-03-26  6:23   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-25 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 02/26] block: Annotate the block device functions Bart Van Assche
2026-03-26  6:25   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-26 15:55     ` Bart Van Assche
2026-03-27 18:17       ` Marco Elver
2026-03-27 18:27         ` Bart Van Assche
2026-03-25 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 03/26] block/cgroup: Split blkg_conf_prep() Bart Van Assche
2026-03-26  6:25   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-25 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 04/26] block/cgroup: Split blkg_conf_exit() Bart Van Assche
2026-03-26  6:26   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-25 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 05/26] block/cgroup: Modify the blkg_conf_open_bdev_frozen() calling convention Bart Van Assche
2026-03-26  6:28   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-25 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 06/26] block/crypto: Annotate the crypto functions Bart Van Assche
2026-03-26  6:28   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-25 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 07/26] block/blk-iocost: Add lock context annotations Bart Van Assche
2026-03-26  6:31   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-25 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 08/26] block/blk-mq-debugfs: Improve " Bart Van Assche
2026-03-26  6:32   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-25 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 09/26] block/blk-zoned: Add " Bart Van Assche
2026-03-26  6:42   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-25 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 10/26] block/ioctl: " Bart Van Assche
2026-03-26  6:39   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-25 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 11/26] block/Kyber: Make the lock context annotations compatible with Clang Bart Van Assche
2026-03-26  6:40   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-25 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 12/26] block/mq-deadline: " Bart Van Assche
2026-03-25 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 13/26] block: Enable lock context analysis Bart Van Assche
2026-03-25 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 14/26] aoe: Add a lock context annotation Bart Van Assche
2026-03-26 14:13   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-25 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 15/26] drbd: Balance RCU calls in drbd_adm_dump_devices() Bart Van Assche
2026-03-26 14:14   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-25 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 16/26] drbd: Make the lock context annotations compatible with Clang Bart Van Assche
2026-03-26 14:18   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-03-25 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 17/26] loop: Add lock context annotations Bart Van Assche
2026-03-26 14:18   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-25 21:44 ` [PATCH v2 18/26] mtip32: Enable lock context analysis Bart Van Assche
2026-03-26 14:18   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-25 21:45 ` [PATCH v2 19/26] nbd: " Bart Van Assche
2026-03-26 14:18   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-25 21:45 ` [PATCH v2 20/26] null_blk: " Bart Van Assche
2026-03-26 14:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-25 21:45 ` [PATCH v2 21/26] rbd: " Bart Van Assche
2026-03-25 21:45 ` [PATCH v2 22/26] ublk: " Bart Van Assche
2026-03-25 21:45 ` [PATCH v2 23/26] xen-blkback: " Bart Van Assche
2026-03-26  9:25   ` Roger Pau Monné
2026-03-25 21:45 ` [PATCH v2 24/26] zram: " Bart Van Assche
2026-03-25 21:45 ` [PATCH v2 25/26] rnbd: " Bart Van Assche
2026-03-26  6:58   ` Jinpu Wang
2026-03-25 21:45 ` [PATCH v2 26/26] block: Enable lock context analysis for all block drivers Bart Van Assche
2026-03-26  6:23 ` [PATCH v2 00/26] Enable lock context analysis Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260326141814.GC16166@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=lars.ellenberg@linbit.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=philipp.reisner@linbit.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox