From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>, Avinesh Kumar <avinesh.kumar@suse.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] zram: do not forget to endio for partial discard requests
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 17:49:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260331174926.58ef8dc4d40ac12f8ce3905d@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260331074255.777019-1-senozhatsky@chromium.org>
On Tue, 31 Mar 2026 16:42:44 +0900 Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org> wrote:
> As reported by Qu Wenruo, the following
>
> getconf PAGESIZE
> 65536
> blkdiscard -p 4k /dev/zram0
>
> takes literally forever to complete.
I'm wondering how you measured this interval ;)
> zram doesn't support
> partial discards and just returns immediately w/o doing any
> discard work in such cases. The problem is that we forget
> to endio on our way out, so blkdiscard sleeps forever in
> submit_bio_wait(). Fix this by jumping to end_bio label,
> which does bio_endio().
>
> Fixes: 0120dd6e4e202 ("zram: make zram_bio_discard more self-contained")
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
> Reported-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/92361cd3-fb8b-482e-bc89-15ff1acb9a59@suse.com
> Test-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> Cc: Avinesh Kumar <avinesh.kumar@suse.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Thanks. I made several changes to the changelog from the earlier
discussion (Anivesh Reported-by:/Closes:) and added a cc:stable.
0120dd6e4e202 was a few years ago so no need to rush this into mainline
- target this to the upcoming merge window.
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Subject: zram: do not forget to endio for partial discard requests
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 16:42:44 +0900
As reported by Qu Wenruo and Avinesh Kumar, the following
getconf PAGESIZE
65536
blkdiscard -p 4k /dev/zram0
takes literally forever to complete. zram doesn't support partial
discards and just returns immediately w/o doing any discard work in such
cases. The problem is that we forget to endio on our way out, so
blkdiscard sleeps forever in submit_bio_wait(). Fix this by jumping to
end_bio label, which does bio_endio().
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20260331074255.777019-1-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Fixes: 0120dd6e4e202 ("zram: make zram_bio_discard more self-contained")
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Reported-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/92361cd3-fb8b-482e-bc89-15ff1acb9a59@suse.com
Tested-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reported-by: Avinesh Kumar <avinesh.kumar@suse.com>
Closes: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256530
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c~zram-do-not-forget-to-endio-for-partial-discard-requests
+++ a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -2678,7 +2678,7 @@ static void zram_bio_discard(struct zram
*/
if (offset) {
if (n <= (PAGE_SIZE - offset))
- return;
+ goto end_bio;
n -= (PAGE_SIZE - offset);
index++;
@@ -2693,6 +2693,7 @@ static void zram_bio_discard(struct zram
n -= PAGE_SIZE;
}
+end_bio:
bio_endio(bio);
}
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-01 0:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-31 7:42 [PATCH v3] zram: do not forget to endio for partial discard requests Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-03-31 15:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-01 0:49 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2026-04-01 1:10 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260331174926.58ef8dc4d40ac12f8ce3905d@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avinesh.kumar@suse.com \
--cc=bgeffon@google.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox