From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
axboe@kernel.dk, hch@lst.de, tom.leiming@gmail.com,
coshi036@gmail.com, Igor.Achkinazi@dell.com, dlemoal@kernel.org,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 4/5] block: move bio validation into __bio_split_to_limits
Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 09:25:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260520072548.GC14937@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260519172326.3462354-5-kbusch@meta.com>
Replying here, but at least the high-level issue applies to the
previous patch as well.
Moving the checking from submit_bio_noacct into __bio_split_to_limits
means that we lose it for bio-based drivers except for the few that
manuall call bio_split_to_limits. So we'll still need a helper for
them, which could be called just before calling into ->submit_bio.
> -static inline blk_status_t blk_check_zone_append(struct request_queue *q,
> - struct bio *bio)
> -{
Keeping a helper for this instead of doing a lot of work in a switch
statements feels nicer.
> -static blk_status_t blk_validate_atomic_write_op_size(struct request_queue *q,
> - struct bio *bio)
> -{
> - if (bio->bi_iter.bi_size > queue_atomic_write_unit_max_bytes(q))
> - return BLK_STS_INVAL;
> -
> - if (bio->bi_iter.bi_size % queue_atomic_write_unit_min_bytes(q))
> - return BLK_STS_INVAL;
> -
> - return BLK_STS_OK;
> -}
Similar for this one.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-20 7:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-19 17:23 [PATCH RFC 0/5] block: validate bios against queue limits in the entered context Keith Busch
2026-05-19 17:23 ` [PATCH RFC 1/5] blk-mq: fix status for unaligned bio Keith Busch
2026-05-20 6:56 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-05-20 7:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-05-20 19:54 ` Chao S
2026-05-19 17:23 ` [PATCH RFC 2/5] block: fix invalid zone append status Keith Busch
2026-05-20 6:58 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-05-20 7:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-05-19 17:23 ` [PATCH RFC 3/5] block: validate bio bounds in the queue entered context Keith Busch
2026-05-20 7:22 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-05-20 7:25 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-05-19 17:23 ` [PATCH RFC 4/5] block: move bio validation into __bio_split_to_limits Keith Busch
2026-05-20 7:25 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-05-20 15:19 ` Keith Busch
2026-05-19 17:23 ` [PATCH RFC 5/5] block, nvme: add failed_bio callback for multipath bio failover Keith Busch
2026-05-20 7:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-05-20 15:07 ` Keith Busch
2026-05-20 15:26 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260520072548.GC14937@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=Igor.Achkinazi@dell.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=coshi036@gmail.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kbusch@meta.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox