Re: [PATCH v3] loop: Fix NULL pointer dereference in lo_rw_aio()

[Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>]

on Mon, 1 Jun 2026 18:36:19 -0500 Ming Lei wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2026 at 07:17:30AM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 Jun 2026 17:14:59 -0500 Ming Lei wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 02, 2026 at 05:51:26AM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> > > > On OnMon, 1 Jun 2026 10:29:25 -0500 Ming Lei wrote:
> > > > > syzbot log shows the null-ptr-deref  is on WRITE, instead of DISCARD.
> > > > >
> > > > > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=cd8a9a308e879a4e2c28
> > > > >
> > > > > Adding WARN_ON(!lo->lo_backing_file) in loop_queue_rq() might capture
> > > > > this bio submission context if this req isn't issued via wq.
> > > > >
> > > > I suspect this makes $.02 sense given the check of Lo_bound upon queuing rq.
> > > 
> > > Can't lo->lo_state be updated after the check? It is totally lockless...
> > >
> > Sounds good hm... do you mean it is UNWISE to not flush the loop workqueue
> > when closing disk?
> 
> Quite the opposite, it is wise to not flush wq in __loop_clr_fd(), please
> see my previous comment.
>
When queuing rq, if lo_state is updated after checking Lo_bond, I see nothing
that prevents syzbot from reporting null-ptr-deref exists. Can you tippoint
why flush is NOT needed if you are right?