From: guzebing <guzebing1612@gmail.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Guzebing <guzebing1612@gmail.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] block: Make WBT latency writes honor enable state
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2026 09:40:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260621014030.1625306-1-guzebing1612@gmail.com> (raw)
From: Guzebing <guzebing1612@gmail.com>
queue/wbt_lat_usec controls both the stored WBT latency target and the
effective WBT enable state.
The old no-op check skipped updates whenever the converted latency
matched the stored min_lat_nsec. That check ignored whether the current
WBT state already matched the state requested by the write. For a queue
disabled by default, attempting to enable WBT by writing the default
value through sysfs could return success while the enable state was left
unchanged.
Treat a write as a no-op only when both the stored latency and the
effective WBT enabled state already match the converted value.
Signed-off-by: Guzebing <guzebing1612@gmail.com>
---
Background:
The issue can be reproduced on an NVMe namespace when BFQ is available:
echo bfq > /sys/block/nvme0n1/queue/scheduler
cat /sys/block/nvme0n1/queue/wbt_lat_usec
echo 2000 > /sys/block/nvme0n1/queue/wbt_lat_usec
cat /sys/block/nvme0n1/queue/wbt_lat_usec
After BFQ selects the queue, WBT is disabled by default. On a
non-rotational NVMe namespace the stored default latency remains
2000000 nsec, while the sysfs file reports 0 because the effective WBT
state is disabled:
queue/wbt_lat_usec = 0
debugfs enabled = 3
debugfs min_lat_nsec = 2000000
Writing the default value succeeds, but the old no-op check skips the
state transition because min_lat_nsec already matches the converted
value:
echo 2000 > /sys/block/nvme0n1/queue/wbt_lat_usec
# echo returns success, but:
queue/wbt_lat_usec = 0
debugfs enabled = 3
debugfs min_lat_nsec = 2000000
As a control, writing a non-default value first does work:
echo 5000 > /sys/block/nvme0n1/queue/wbt_lat_usec
queue/wbt_lat_usec = 5000
debugfs enabled = 2
debugfs min_lat_nsec = 5000000
Writing the default value after that also works, because the stored
latency changes from 5000000 nsec back to 2000000 nsec:
echo 2000 > /sys/block/nvme0n1/queue/wbt_lat_usec
queue/wbt_lat_usec = 2000
debugfs enabled = 2
debugfs min_lat_nsec = 2000000
With this patch, writing the default value after BFQ default-disables
WBT also re-enables WBT as expected:
queue/wbt_lat_usec = 2000
debugfs enabled = 2
debugfs min_lat_nsec = 2000000
block/blk-wbt.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-wbt.c b/block/blk-wbt.c
index dcc2438ca16dc..953d400fd0137 100644
--- a/block/blk-wbt.c
+++ b/block/blk-wbt.c
@@ -813,6 +813,21 @@ static void wbt_queue_depth_changed(struct rq_qos *rqos)
wbt_update_limits(RQWB(rqos));
}
+static bool wbt_set_lat_changed(struct request_queue *q, u64 val)
+{
+ struct rq_qos *rqos = wbt_rq_qos(q);
+ struct rq_wb *rwb;
+
+ if (!rqos)
+ return true;
+
+ rwb = RQWB(rqos);
+ if (rwb->min_lat_nsec != val)
+ return true;
+
+ return rwb_enabled(rwb) != !!val;
+}
+
static void wbt_exit(struct rq_qos *rqos)
{
struct rq_wb *rwb = RQWB(rqos);
@@ -1005,8 +1020,12 @@ int wbt_set_lat(struct gendisk *disk, s64 val)
else if (val >= 0)
val *= 1000ULL;
- if (wbt_get_min_lat(q) == val)
+ mutex_lock(&disk->rqos_state_mutex);
+ if (!wbt_set_lat_changed(q, val)) {
+ mutex_unlock(&disk->rqos_state_mutex);
goto out;
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&disk->rqos_state_mutex);
blk_mq_quiesce_queue(q);
--
2.20.1
reply other threads:[~2026-06-21 1:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260621014030.1625306-1-guzebing1612@gmail.com \
--to=guzebing1612@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox