From: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>
To: josef@toxicpanda.com, axboe@kernel.dk, edumazet@google.com
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, nbd@other.debian.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>,
syzbot+6b85d1e39a5b8ed9a954@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH] nbd: don't warn when reclassifying a busy socket lock
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 05:22:55 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260621235255.66015-1-kartikey406@gmail.com> (raw)
nbd_reclassify_socket() warns via WARN_ON_ONCE() if the socket lock is
held at the point of reclassification. That assertion was copied from
nvme-tcp, where the socket is created internally by the kernel
(sock_create_kern()) and is never visible to user space, so the lock
is guaranteed to be free.
NBD is different: the socket is looked up from a user-supplied fd in
nbd_get_socket(), and user space retains that fd. A concurrent syscall
on the same socket (or softirq processing taking bh_lock_sock() on a
connected TCP socket) can legitimately hold the lock at the instant
NBD reclassifies it. sock_allow_reclassification() then returns false
and the WARN_ON_ONCE() fires, which turns into a crash under
panic_on_warn. This is reachable by simply racing NBD_CMD_CONNECT
against socket activity on the same fd, as reported by syzbot.
Hitting a held lock here is expected for an externally owned socket and
is not a kernel bug, so skip reclassification silently instead of
warning. Reclassification is a lockdep-only annotation, so skipping it
in the rare racing case is harmless.
Reported-by: syzbot+6b85d1e39a5b8ed9a954@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=6b85d1e39a5b8ed9a954
Fixes: d532cddb6c60 ("nbd: Reclassify sockets to avoid lockdep circular dependency")
Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>
---
drivers/block/nbd.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/nbd.c b/drivers/block/nbd.c
index 3a585a0c882a..8f10762e90ef 100644
--- a/drivers/block/nbd.c
+++ b/drivers/block/nbd.c
@@ -1246,7 +1246,7 @@ static void nbd_reclassify_socket(struct socket *sock)
{
struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!sock_allow_reclassification(sk)))
+ if (!sock_allow_reclassification(sk))
return;
switch (sk->sk_family) {
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-06-21 23:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-21 23:52 Deepanshu Kartikey [this message]
2026-06-22 1:43 ` [PATCH] nbd: don't warn when reclassifying a busy socket lock Hillf Danton
2026-06-22 8:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-06-22 8:31 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260621235255.66015-1-kartikey406@gmail.com \
--to=kartikey406@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nbd@other.debian.org \
--cc=syzbot+6b85d1e39a5b8ed9a954@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox