From: Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>
To: <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <dm-devel@lists.linux.dev>, <hch@lst.de>, <axboe@kernel.dk>,
<brauner@kernel.org>, <djwong@kernel.org>,
<viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/5] block: validate direct I/O memory alignment
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 10:09:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260624170905.3972095-1-kbusch@meta.com> (raw)
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
This addresses the misaligned direct-io problem behind various threads:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20260610145218.141369-1-cem@kernel.org/
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAC_j7i1R7oy+nRhxEjCTba=DUgn02w9X+p94DCu0aHv5+5tKnQ@mail.gmail.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/ai7rnH20IYeSmY8s@gallifrey/
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20260616154009.2123183-1-kbusch@meta.com/
The previously tested fixes are correct as far as they go, but they
treat the symptom: they only matter because an invalid bio reaches those
drivers in the first place.
The reason it reaches them is an assumption I made when I removed
direct-io alignment checks in 5ff3f74e145a ("block: simplify direct io
validity check") and 7eac331869575 ("iomap: simplify direct io validity
check"): every bio is eventually split to the device limits, and the
upper layers cope with resulting errors once the bio has formed. Both
were optimistic assumptions. Drivers with their own ->submit_bio may
never pass through blk_mq_submit_bio()'s split, so the check never runs
for them, and as numerous threads showed, the consumers don't uniformly
handle this condition.
This series stops the invalid bio at the source instead. It validates
the buffer's alignment against the alignment limits when the bio is
built from the iov_iter. The check is folded into the bvec extraction
that already walks the vectors, so it adds only a comparison on a path
that is pinning direct-io pages anyway. Misalignment is now uniformly
rejected with EINVAL before submission for every direct-io path.
v2->v3:
- Dropped the bio_endio_errno helper and open-coded its two users.
- Documented the ITER_BVEC alignment expectation in uio.h and reworded
the bvec check comment; the exhaustive per-segment validation stays
behind CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL as a contract assertion.
- Reworked zloop_get_block_size() to mirror loop's structure.
- loop/zloop only ever tighten dma_alignment beyond the default. I
think these could use more relaxed alignments, but I'm just being
extra conservative against introducing new changes here.
Previous version:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20260622174241.2299563-1-kbusch@meta.com/
Keith Busch (5):
block: use blkdev_iov_iter_get_pages status for errors
block: fix dio leak on metadata mapping error
loop: set dma_alignment from the backing file for direct I/O
zloop: set dma_alignment from the backing files for direct I/O
block: validate user space vectors during extraction
block/bio.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
block/blk-map.c | 2 +-
block/fops.c | 10 ++++----
drivers/block/loop.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
drivers/block/zloop.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++--------
fs/iomap/direct-io.c | 1 +
include/linux/bio.h | 2 +-
include/linux/uio.h | 10 +++++++-
lib/iov_iter.c | 9 ++++++-
9 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
base-commit: 5c7804e3279c9bdc36e5eac743b4000633b25f65
--
2.53.0-Meta
next reply other threads:[~2026-06-24 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-24 17:09 Keith Busch [this message]
2026-06-24 17:09 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] block: use blkdev_iov_iter_get_pages status for errors Keith Busch
2026-06-24 17:09 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] block: fix dio leak on metadata mapping error Keith Busch
2026-06-24 17:09 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] loop: set dma_alignment from the backing file for direct I/O Keith Busch
2026-06-24 17:09 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] zloop: set dma_alignment from the backing files " Keith Busch
2026-06-24 17:09 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] block: validate user space vectors during extraction Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260624170905.3972095-1-kbusch@meta.com \
--to=kbusch@meta.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox