From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] block: try slab allocation in bio_alloc_bioset() before mempool
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2026 10:01:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260709020145.4011533-1-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
When the per-CPU bio cache is enabled but empty, bio_alloc_percpu_cache()
returns NULL and bio_alloc_bioset() falls straight through to the mempool
fallback:
if (unlikely(!bio)) {
if (!(saved_gfp & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM))
return NULL;
...
}
For non-sleeping allocations (no __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM) this returns NULL
without ever attempting a slab allocation, even when there is plenty of
free memory.
Commit b520c4eef83d ("block: split bio_alloc_bioset more clearly into a
fast and slowpath") introduced this. Before it, a percpu cache miss fell
through to mempool_alloc(), which attempted the underlying slab allocation
first and only failed when that slab allocation failed. The restructuring
dropped the slab attempt that non-sleeping callers of a cache-enabled
bioset (such as the default fs_bio_set used by bio_alloc()) relied on.
Try a slab allocation with optimistic GFP_ flags before falling back to
the mempool whenever the bio is still NULL, so both the cache-empty and
non-cache paths share the same slab attempt. This restores the previous
behavior for non-sleeping allocations.
Fixes: b520c4eef83d ("block: split bio_alloc_bioset more clearly into a fast and slowpath")
Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
---
block/bio.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
index f2a5f4d0a9672..982f2e47a4218 100644
--- a/block/bio.c
+++ b/block/bio.c
@@ -555,6 +555,14 @@ struct bio *bio_alloc_bioset(struct block_device *bdev, unsigned short nr_vecs,
bio = bio_alloc_percpu_cache(bs);
} else {
opf &= ~REQ_ALLOC_CACHE;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * For a bioset without a percpu cache, or when the percpu cache was
+ * empty, try a slab allocation with optimistic GFP_ flags before
+ * falling back to the mempool.
+ */
+ if (!bio) {
p = kmem_cache_alloc(bs->bio_slab, gfp);
if (p)
bio = p + bs->front_pad;
--
2.39.3
next reply other threads:[~2026-07-09 2:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 2:01 Joseph Qi [this message]
2026-07-09 4:48 ` [PATCH v2] block: try slab allocation in bio_alloc_bioset() before mempool Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260709020145.4011533-1-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=libaokun@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox