From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, hch@lst.de, brauner@kernel.org,
djwong@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
regressions@lists.linux.dev, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/5] block: validate direct I/O memory alignment
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 13:26:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260730112626.GA24827@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ampce7mxSmxAwAiu@kbusch-mbp>
On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 02:03:07PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > > Hi Jens, have you had a chance to look at this one yet? This addresses
> > > previous issues with certain device mappers under direct io.
> >
> > I they look fine, but at this point we should toss them into 7.3. Yes
> > I know there are regressions around this, but from 6.1x days. And the
> > series doesn't apply to the current block-7.2 anyway.
>
> This series is kind of old at this point, but yes, it's not fixing a new
> regression either. I'm okay if this goes to the next window, and I will
> handle the stable follow-up.
Honestly, I think that'a a reall bad idea. This is a regression in 6.18,
and while it took a while for people to hit this with their a little
more complicated lvm/md setups, it has stopped real systems from being
used. We need to fix this ASAP.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-30 11:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-20 20:10 [PATCH RESEND 0/5] block: validate direct I/O memory alignment Keith Busch
2026-07-20 20:10 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/5] block: use blkdev_iov_iter_get_pages status for errors Keith Busch
2026-07-20 20:10 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/5] block: fix dio leak on metadata mapping error Keith Busch
2026-07-20 20:10 ` [PATCH RESEND 3/5] loop: set dma_alignment from the backing file for direct I/O Keith Busch
2026-07-20 20:10 ` [PATCH RESEND 4/5] zloop: set dma_alignment from the backing files " Keith Busch
2026-07-20 20:10 ` [PATCH RESEND 5/5] block: validate user space vectors during extraction Keith Busch
2026-07-29 19:15 ` [PATCH RESEND 0/5] block: validate direct I/O memory alignment Keith Busch
2026-07-29 19:18 ` Jens Axboe
2026-07-29 20:03 ` Keith Busch
2026-07-29 23:34 ` Jens Axboe
2026-07-30 11:26 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-07-30 12:52 ` Keith Busch
2026-07-30 16:22 ` Jens Axboe
2026-07-30 13:25 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2026-07-30 16:23 ` Jens Axboe
2026-07-30 16:46 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260730112626.GA24827@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kbusch@meta.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).