From: Chao Shi <coshi036@gmail.com>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Weidong Zhu <weizhu@fiu.edu>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [stable request] block: stop the timeout timer when releasing a never added disk
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 15:58:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260817195833.2971170-1-coshi036@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
Please consider the following mainline commit for the stable trees:
26cb8ebbfaf7 ("block: stop the timeout timer when releasing a never
added disk")
It first appeared in v7.2-rc6 and shipped in v7.2.
Why it should be applied
------------------------
disk_release() undoes blk_mq_init_allocated_queue() for a disk whose
probe failed before add_disk(), but it only calls blk_mq_exit_queue().
Nothing there stops q->timeout, and that timer rolls forward: it stays
pending until it next expires, not until the last request completes. So
if the driver issued any I/O before adding the disk, the request_queue
is freed while still linked into a timer wheel bucket.
That is a use-after-free. With KASAN it is reported in
detach_if_pending(), enqueue_timer() or __run_timers(); without KASAN it
shows up as a general protection fault in the timer wheel, in a task
unrelated to the driver that leaked the timer.
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in detach_if_pending+0x30c/0x340
Write of size 8 at addr ffff888004d71310 by task kworker/u8:2/37
__timer_delete_sync+0x156/0x240 kernel/time/timer.c:1621
blk_sync_queue+0x22/0x40 block/blk-core.c:222
nvme_sync_queues+0x100/0x150 drivers/nvme/host/core.c:5362
nvme_reset_work+0x138/0x930 drivers/nvme/host/pci.c:3264
nvme reaches it because nvme_update_ns_info() submits Report Zones or
FDP io-mgmt-recv on ns->queue before the disk is added, so a later
failure lands in put_disk() with the timer still armed.
Which trees
-----------
All supported branches from 6.1.y up: 7.1.y, 6.18.y, 6.12.y, 6.6.y and
6.1.y.
The regression was introduced by 6f8191fdf41d ("block: simplify disk
shutdown"), which is v6.0, so 5.15.y and 5.10.y are not affected and
should be skipped.
Backport notes
--------------
The commit applies cleanly to all five branches (checked with
git apply --check against block/genhd.c from each branch), so no
backport is needed. The two helpers it adds calls to, blk_sync_queue()
and blk_mq_cancel_work_sync(), are already called from block/genhd.c on
every one of those branches.
Thanks,
Chao
reply other threads:[~2026-08-17 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260817195833.2971170-1-coshi036@gmail.com \
--to=coshi036@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=weizhu@fiu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox