Linux block layer
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergii Ushakov <sergiiushakov@google.com>
To: mst@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stefanha@redhat.com,
	hch@infradead.org,  jasowangio@gmail.com,
	xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com, eperezma@redhat.com,
	 pbonzini@redhat.com, Sergii Ushakov <sergiiushakov@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] virtio-blk: clamp max_segments to virtqueue ring size
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 13:34:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260918113412.1142493-1-sergiiushakov@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260916104218-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>

In virtblk_add_req(), each request consumes 2 extra descriptors (out_hdr
and in_hdr) in addition to the data scatter-gather segments.

When a hypervisor (e.g. QNX Hypervisor) advertises VIRTIO_BLK_F_SEG_MAX
with seg_max = 1024 alongside a 1024-entry split ring (vring.num = 1024)
and VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC disabled, lim->max_segments is set to
1024. When the block layer submits requests with 1023 or 1024 data
segments, total_sg reaches 1025 or 1026. This exceeds vring.num (1024),
causing virtqueue_add_split() to return -ENOSPC and permanently wedge
the blk-mq queue.

Furthermore, the Virtio specification (2.7.5.3.1) requires that a
descriptor chain never exceed the Queue Size, and virtqueue_add_split()
falls back to direct descriptors if indirect table allocation fails.

Fix this by:
1. Rejecting queues with ring_size < 3 at probe, or
   ring_size < (queue_max_segments + 2) during resume/reset recovery in
   init_vq().
2. Unconditionally clamping sg_elems to (ring_size - 2) across all
   virtqueues in virtblk_read_limits().

Signed-off-by: Sergii Ushakov <sergiiushakov@google.com>
---
Hi Michael,

Thank you for the detailed review!

I logged the values in virtblk_read_limits() on the QNX Hypervisor guest:
  virtio_blk virtio0: 1/0/0 default/read/poll queues
  virtio_blk virtio0: F_SEG_MAX=1 seg_max=1024 F_INDIRECT=0 vring_size=1024 max_segments=1024

  dev_info(&vdev->dev,
           "virtio_blk debug: F_SEG_MAX=%d seg_max=%u F_INDIRECT=%d vring_size=%u max_segments=%u\n",
           virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_SEG_MAX),
           sg_elems,
           virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC),
           virtqueue_get_vring_size(vblk->vqs[0].vq),
           lim->max_segments);

So what actually happens:
1. The host *does* advertise VIRTIO_BLK_F_SEG_MAX=1 with seg_max=1024 (setting
   seg_max equal to the virtqueue size vring_size=1024), and does *not*
   offer VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC (F_INDIRECT=0).
2. Because seg_max (1024) <= VIRTIO_BLK_MAX_SG_ELEMS - 2 (32766),
   virtblk_read_limits() sets lim->max_segments = 1024.
3. The block layer submits requests with 1023 or 1024 data segments.
   virtblk_add_req() adds 2 extra descriptors (out_hdr and in_hdr),
   resulting in total_sg > 1024.
4. Since total_sg > vq->split.vring.num and !vq->indirect,
   virtqueue_add_split() triggers:
     WARN_ON_ONCE(total_sg > vq->split.vring.num && !vq->indirect);

In v3, I drop the !virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC)
condition and clamp sg_elems to (ring_size - 2) unconditionally across all
virtqueues.

Also, init_vq() checks all virtqueues:
- At initial probe (!vblk->disk), it enforces ring_size >= 3.
- On resume/recovery, it enforces
  ring_size >= queue_max_segments(vblk->disk->queue) + 2.

Logs after the v3 patch:
  virtio_blk virtio0: F_SEG_MAX=1 seg_max=1022 F_INDIRECT=0 vring_size=1024 max_segments=1022

 drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
index 32bf3ba07a9d..c263d0e3db95 100644
--- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
+++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
@@ -1021,6 +1021,21 @@ static int init_vq(struct virtio_blk *vblk)
 		goto out;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < num_vqs; i++) {
+		unsigned int ring_size = virtqueue_get_vring_size(vqs[i]);
+		unsigned int min_ring_size = 3;
+
+		if (vblk->disk)
+			min_ring_size = queue_max_segments(vblk->disk->queue) + 2;
+
+		if (ring_size < min_ring_size) {
+			dev_err(&vdev->dev,
+				"virtqueue %u ring size %u is smaller than minimum %u\n",
+				i, ring_size, min_ring_size);
+			vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev);
+			err = -EINVAL;
+			goto out;
+		}
+
 		spin_lock_init(&vblk->vqs[i].lock);
 		vblk->vqs[i].vq = vqs[i];
 	}
@@ -1253,7 +1268,7 @@ static int virtblk_read_limits(struct virtio_blk *vblk,
 	u16 min_io_size;
 	u8 physical_block_exp, alignment_offset;
 	size_t max_dma_size;
-	int err;
+	int err, i;
 
 	/* We need to know how many segments before we allocate. */
 	err = virtio_cread_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_SEG_MAX,
@@ -1267,6 +1282,23 @@ static int virtblk_read_limits(struct virtio_blk *vblk,
 	/* Prevent integer overflows and honor max vq size */
 	sg_elems = min_t(u32, sg_elems, VIRTIO_BLK_MAX_SG_ELEMS - 2);
 
+	/*
+	 * virtblk_add_req() uses separate outgoing and incoming header
+	 * descriptors (out_hdr and in_hdr), consuming 2 extra descriptors
+	 * per request in addition to the data segments.
+	 *
+	 * Per virtio specification (2.7.5.3.1), a driver MUST NOT create a
+	 * descriptor chain longer than the Queue Size of the device.
+	 *
+	 * Clamp max_segments to (ring_size - 2) across all virtqueues so
+	 * that a request never exceeds the ring size of any queue.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < vblk->num_vqs; i++) {
+		u32 ring_size = virtqueue_get_vring_size(vblk->vqs[i].vq);
+
+		sg_elems = min_t(u32, sg_elems, ring_size - 2);
+	}
+
 	/* We can handle whatever the host told us to handle. */
 	lim->max_segments = sg_elems;
 
@@ -1466,6 +1498,7 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 	mutex_init(&vblk->vdev_mutex);
 
 	vblk->vdev = vdev;
+	vblk->disk = NULL;
 
 	INIT_WORK(&vblk->config_work, virtblk_config_changed_work);
 
-- 
2.55.0.1082.g2b9226bbc0-goog


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-18 11:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-14 10:59 [PATCH] virtio-blk: clamp max_segments when indirect descriptors are disabled Sergii Ushakov
2026-08-17  7:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-08-17  8:08   ` Sergii Ushakov
2026-08-17 12:41     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-08-17 13:42 ` [PATCH v2] " Sergii Ushakov
2026-08-17 17:28   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2026-08-19  5:52   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-16 14:07   ` Sergii Ushakov
2026-09-16 15:00   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-09-18 11:34     ` Sergii Ushakov [this message]
2026-09-18 12:39       ` [PATCH v3] virtio-blk: clamp max_segments to virtqueue ring size Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-09-18 13:51         ` [PATCH v4] " Sergii Ushakov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260918113412.1142493-1-sergiiushakov@google.com \
    --to=sergiiushakov@google.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jasowangio@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox