From: Maks <mi9992828@gmail.com>
To: axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: Maks Ivanov <mi9992828@gmail.com>,
io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Question about asynchronous blk-mq tag waiting for io_uring
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2026 00:41:37 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261008214137.1267424-1-mi9992828@gmail.com> (raw)
From: Maks Ivanov <mi9992828@gmail.com>
Hi,
I read your comment in liburing issue #1492 about callback-based retry
when storage tags are exhausted:
https://github.com/axboe/liburing/issues/1492#issuecomment-4696489936
I'm considering this direction for my bachelor's thesis and would like
to clarify its scope and design.
The initial scope would be io_uring direct reads on raw block devices.
For requests without explicit RWF_NOWAIT, the mechanism would register
a continuation when tag allocation cannot complete immediately, then
retry submission when a tag becomes available.
Explicit RWF_NOWAIT requests would retain their existing
behaviour when tag allocation would require waiting.
Could you clarify a few points?
- Is this still an open direction worth investigating?
- Is there related work or an existing approach I should look at first?
- Which layer should own the continuation: io_uring, the block submission
path, or blk-mq?
- What lifetime and cancellation constraints would such a mechanism need
to satisfy?
I would also appreciate pointers to other open problems in io_uring or
the block layer that could suit a focused implementation and validation
project. Existing bug reports, design discussions, or TODOs would be
very helpful.
Thanks,
Maks Ivanov
next reply other threads:[~2026-10-08 21:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-08 21:41 Maks [this message]
2026-10-17 17:42 ` Question about asynchronous blk-mq tag waiting for io_uring Maks Ivanov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261008214137.1267424-1-mi9992828@gmail.com \
--to=mi9992828@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox