Linux block layer
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, tz2294@columbia.edu,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, l1za0.sec@gmail.com, kbusch@kernel.org,
	hch@lst.de, hare@kernel.org, 4ncienth@gmail.com,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk
Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] iov_iter: validate extracted segment for bvec alignment
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 12:17:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261020121729.20f67583f23babed12f998ee@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261020184333.19AAA1F01573@smtp.kernel.org>

On Tue, 20 Oct 2026 11:43:32 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> From: Daehyeon Ko <4ncienth@gmail.com>
> Subject: iov_iter: validate extracted segment for bvec alignment
> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 15:19:07 +0900
> 
> iov_iter_extract_bvecs() validates iter_iov_addr() and iter_iov_len()
> before iov_iter_extract_pages() selects the first nonempty segment and
> limits it by iter->count.  The checks can therefore cover a different
> range after a leading empty segment or iov_iter_truncate().
> 
> An unprivileged O_DIRECT preadv() reproduced the empty-segment case: an
> aligned empty segment followed by a misaligned one completed 4096 bytes
> instead of returning -EINVAL.  A truncated iterator has the same mismatch
> when its full segment length is aligned but its remaining count is not.
> 
> The worst effect I have confirmed is an alignment-contract bypass.  An
> unprivileged O_DIRECT preadv() produced bvecs with offset/length pairs
> (1, 4095) and (0, 1).  The bio reached brd_submit_bio(), and the read
> completed 4096 bytes instead of failing with -EINVAL.
> 
> I have not demonstrated harmful behavior on real DMA hardware.  For a
> normal blk-mq target, blk_mq_submit_bio() calls
> __bio_split_to_limits(), where bio_split_io_at() rejects the misaligned
> bvec before queue_rq().  Virtio-blk and loop both returned -EINVAL in
> my controls.
> 
> So a bio-based driver can receive a bvec which violates its advertised
> dma_alignment, but any further effect is driver-specific.  I have not
> reproduced memory corruption or a crash on real hardware.
> 
> Bound the normal fast-path length by iter->count.  Keep
> first_iovec_segment() for leading empty segments so validation covers the
> remaining portion of the segment available for extraction.

I guess I should have added

Tested-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>	#writev() only


I tested this against the ext4 writev() KASAN reproducer.  The
unpatched kernel triggered a slab out-of-bounds read and returned 1015
bytes.  With the patch applied, writev() returned the expected 1025
bytes without a KASAN report.  But I didn't test the preadv() path.



      reply	other threads:[~2026-10-20 19:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-20 18:43 [patch 1/1] iov_iter: validate extracted segment for bvec alignment Andrew Morton
2026-10-20 19:17 ` Andrew Morton [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261020121729.20f67583f23babed12f998ee@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=4ncienth@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hare@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=l1za0.sec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tz2294@columbia.edu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox