From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] block: cleanup and fix batch completion adding conditions
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 08:18:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20575f0a-656e-4bb3-9d82-dec6c7e3a35c@kernel.dk> (raw)
The conditions for whether or not a request is allowed adding to a
completion batch are a bit hard to read, and they also have a few
issues. One is that ioerror may indeed be a random value on passthrough,
and it's being checked unconditionally of whether or not the given
request is a passthrough request or not.
Rewrite the conditions to be separate for easier reading, and only check
ioerror for non-passthrough requests. This fixes an issue with bio
unmapping on passthrough, where it fails getting added to a batch. This
both leads to suboptimal performance, and may trigger a potential
schedule-under-atomic condition for polled passthrough IO.
Fixes: f794f3351f26 ("block: add support for blk_mq_end_request_batch()")
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
index a0a9007cc1e3..cc1cb5de8fb6 100644
--- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
+++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
@@ -861,12 +861,22 @@ static inline bool blk_mq_add_to_batch(struct request *req,
void (*complete)(struct io_comp_batch *))
{
/*
- * blk_mq_end_request_batch() can't end request allocated from
- * sched tags
+ * Check various conditions that exclude batch processing:
+ * 1) No batch container
+ * 2) Has scheduler data attached
+ * 3) Not a passthrough request and end_io set
+ * 4) Not a passthrough request and an ioerror
*/
- if (!iob || (req->rq_flags & RQF_SCHED_TAGS) || ioerror ||
- (req->end_io && !blk_rq_is_passthrough(req)))
+ if (!iob)
return false;
+ if (req->rq_flags & RQF_SCHED_TAGS)
+ return false;
+ if (!blk_rq_is_passthrough(req)) {
+ if (req->end_io)
+ return false;
+ if (ioerror < 0)
+ return false;
+ }
if (!iob->complete)
iob->complete = complete;
--
Jens Axboe
next reply other threads:[~2025-02-13 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-13 15:18 Jens Axboe [this message]
2025-02-19 7:26 ` [PATCH] block: cleanup and fix batch completion adding conditions Shinichiro Kawasaki
2025-02-19 19:17 ` alan.adamson
2025-02-20 1:04 ` alan.adamson
2025-02-20 7:28 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2025-02-28 11:59 ` Ondrej Kozina
2025-02-28 14:08 ` Jens Axboe
2025-02-28 14:32 ` Ondrej Kozina
2025-03-04 9:25 ` Milan Broz
2025-03-11 3:03 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2025-03-11 14:59 ` Milan Broz
2025-03-11 15:00 ` Jens Axboe
2025-03-19 18:54 ` Milan Broz
2025-03-12 11:17 ` Ondrej Kozina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20575f0a-656e-4bb3-9d82-dec6c7e3a35c@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox