From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] block: factor out a bio_await helper
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2026 08:35:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2065a50d-9029-44a6-9da0-4a2bb896bdb2@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260401140433.125924-3-hch@lst.de>
On 4/1/26 7:03 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> +/**
> + * bio_await - call a function on a bio, and wait until it completes
> + * @bio: the bio which describes the I/O
> + * @kick: function called to "kick off" the bio
> + * @priv: private data passed to @kick.
> + *
> + * Wait for the bio as well as any bio chained off it after executing the
> + * passed in callback @kick. The wait for the bio is set up before calling
> + * @kick to ensure that the completion is captured. If @kick is %NULL,
> + * submit_bio() is used instead to submit the bio.
> + *
> + * Note: this overrides the bi_private and bi_end_io fields in the bio.
> + */
> +void bio_await(struct bio *bio, void *priv,
> + void (*kick)(struct bio *bio, void *priv))
Please consider swapping the @priv and @kick arguments because that's
the argument order used elsewhere in the Linux kernel for callback
function pointers and their private data pointer.
> int submit_bio_wait(struct bio *bio)
> {
> - DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK_MAP(done,
> - bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk->lockdep_map);
> -
> - bio->bi_private = &done;
> - bio->bi_end_io = bio_wait_end_io;
> - bio->bi_opf |= REQ_SYNC;
> - submit_bio(bio);
> - blk_wait_io(&done);
> -
> + bio_await(bio, NULL, NULL);
> return blk_status_to_errno(bio->bi_status);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(submit_bio_wait);
What happened to the bio->bi_opf |= REQ_SYNC statement? Shouldn't that
statement be preserved?
Otherwise this patch looks good to me.
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-01 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-01 14:03 refactor submit_bio_wait and bio await helpers Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-01 14:03 ` [PATCH 1/4] block: unify the synchronous bi_end_io callbacks Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-01 15:30 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-04-01 14:03 ` [PATCH 2/4] block: factor out a bio_await helper Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-01 15:35 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2026-04-06 5:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-01 14:03 ` [PATCH 3/4] block: add a bio_submit_or_kill helper Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-01 15:42 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-04-06 5:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-01 14:03 ` [PATCH 4/4] xfs: use bio_await in xfs_zone_gc_reset_sync Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-04-06 5:57 refactor submit_bio_wait and bio await helpers v2 Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-06 5:57 ` [PATCH 2/4] block: factor out a bio_await helper Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-06 7:05 ` Damien Le Moal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2065a50d-9029-44a6-9da0-4a2bb896bdb2@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox