From: "yu kuai" <yukuai@fygo.io>
To: "Yang Erkun" <yangerkun@huawei.com>, <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
<axboe@kernel.dk>, <hch@lst.de>, "yu kuai" <yukuai@fygo.io>
Cc: <yi.zhang@huawei.com>, <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>,
<echo.chenlin@huawei.com>, <leo.lilong@huaweicloud.com>,
<wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>, <huawei.libin@huawei.com>,
<leijitang@huawei.com>, <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
<nbd@other.debian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/8] nbd: factor out a nbd_genl_foreach_sock
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2026 20:14:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <248d334a-5fa5-4568-8083-6249e5cdec78@fygo.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260730082046.3459239-7-yangerkun@huawei.com>
Hi,
在 2026/7/30 16:20, Yang Erkun 写道:
> The NBD_ATTR_SOCKETS walk is duplicated in nbd_genl_connect (add sockets)
> and nbd_genl_reconfigure (reconnect). Factor out a single helper that
> walks the list and calls a callback per fd; with a NULL callback it is a
> pure counter, used by a later patch to learn nr_hw_queues before the
> device exists. Returns the number of fds walked (>= 0) or a negative
> errno; a callback >0 stops early as success (reconnect's -ENOSPC).
>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Erkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/nbd.c | 137 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
This patch LGTM, two nits below.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/nbd.c b/drivers/block/nbd.c
> index 3b7363b11d0b..34b84fc1c61f 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/nbd.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/nbd.c
> @@ -2108,6 +2108,58 @@ static int nbd_genl_size_set(struct genl_info *info, struct nbd_device *nbd)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Walk the NBD_ATTR_SOCKETS nested list can call @cb for each socket fd.
> + *
> + * Return the number of fds walked, or a negative errno.
> + */
> +static int nbd_genl_foreach_sock(struct genl_info *info,
> + int (*cb)(struct nbd_device *nbd, int fd),
> + struct nbd_device *nbd)
> +{
> + struct nlattr *attr;
> + int rem, count = 0;
> +
> + if (!info->attrs[NBD_ATTR_SOCKETS])
> + return 0;
> +
> + nla_for_each_nested(attr, info->attrs[NBD_ATTR_SOCKETS], rem) {
> + struct nlattr *socks[NBD_SOCK_MAX + 1];
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (nla_type(attr) != NBD_SOCK_ITEM) {
> + pr_err("socks must be embedded in a SOCK_ITEM attr\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (nla_parse_nested_deprecated(socks, NBD_SOCK_MAX,
> + attr,
> + nbd_sock_policy,
> + info->extack)) {
> + pr_err("error processing sock list\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (!socks[NBD_SOCK_FD])
> + continue;
> +
> + count++;
> + if (cb) {
> + ret = cb(nbd, (int)nla_get_u32(socks[NBD_SOCK_FD]));
> + if (ret > 0)
> + return count;
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> + return count;
> +}
> +
> +static int nbd_genl_connect_sock_cb(struct nbd_device *nbd, int fd)
> +{
> + return nbd_add_socket(nbd, fd, true);
> +}
> +
> static int nbd_genl_connect(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> {
> struct nbd_device *nbd;
> @@ -2227,36 +2279,9 @@ static int nbd_genl_connect(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> }
> }
>
> - if (info->attrs[NBD_ATTR_SOCKETS]) {
> - struct nlattr *attr;
> - int rem, fd;
> -
> - nla_for_each_nested(attr, info->attrs[NBD_ATTR_SOCKETS],
> - rem) {
> - struct nlattr *socks[NBD_SOCK_MAX+1];
> -
> - if (nla_type(attr) != NBD_SOCK_ITEM) {
> - pr_err("socks must be embedded in a SOCK_ITEM attr\n");
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto out;
> - }
> - ret = nla_parse_nested_deprecated(socks, NBD_SOCK_MAX,
> - attr,
> - nbd_sock_policy,
> - info->extack);
> - if (ret != 0) {
> - pr_err("error processing sock list\n");
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto out;
> - }
> - if (!socks[NBD_SOCK_FD])
> - continue;
> - fd = (int)nla_get_u32(socks[NBD_SOCK_FD]);
> - ret = nbd_add_socket(nbd, fd, true);
> - if (ret)
> - goto out;
> - }
> - }
> + ret = nbd_genl_foreach_sock(info, nbd_genl_connect_sock_cb, nbd);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto out;
>
> if (info->attrs[NBD_ATTR_BACKEND_IDENTIFIER]) {
> nbd->backend = nla_strdup(info->attrs[NBD_ATTR_BACKEND_IDENTIFIER],
> @@ -2345,6 +2370,20 @@ static int nbd_genl_disconnect(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int nbd_genl_reconnect_sock_cb(struct nbd_device *nbd, int fd)
> +{
> + int ret = nbd_reconnect_socket(nbd, fd);
> +
> + if (!ret) {
> + dev_info(nbd_to_dev(nbd), "reconnected socket\n");
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + if (ret == -ENOSPC)
> + return 1;
> + return ret;
> +}
Since there is only one caller for nbd_reconnect_socket(), you might as well just fold above
changes into nbd_reconnect_socket() directly.
> +
> static int nbd_genl_reconfigure(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> {
> struct nbd_device *nbd = NULL;
> @@ -2441,40 +2480,10 @@ static int nbd_genl_reconfigure(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> }
> }
>
> - if (info->attrs[NBD_ATTR_SOCKETS]) {
> - struct nlattr *attr;
> - int rem, fd;
> -
> - nla_for_each_nested(attr, info->attrs[NBD_ATTR_SOCKETS],
> - rem) {
> - struct nlattr *socks[NBD_SOCK_MAX+1];
> -
> - if (nla_type(attr) != NBD_SOCK_ITEM) {
> - pr_err("socks must be embedded in a SOCK_ITEM attr\n");
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto out;
> - }
> - ret = nla_parse_nested_deprecated(socks, NBD_SOCK_MAX,
> - attr,
> - nbd_sock_policy,
> - info->extack);
> - if (ret != 0) {
> - pr_err("error processing sock list\n");
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto out;
> - }
> - if (!socks[NBD_SOCK_FD])
> - continue;
> - fd = (int)nla_get_u32(socks[NBD_SOCK_FD]);
> - ret = nbd_reconnect_socket(nbd, fd);
> - if (ret) {
> - if (ret == -ENOSPC)
> - ret = 0;
> - goto out;
> - }
> - dev_info(nbd_to_dev(nbd), "reconnected socket\n");
> - }
> - }
> + ret = nbd_genl_foreach_sock(info, nbd_genl_reconnect_sock_cb, nbd);
> + /* foreach_sock returns a positive count on success; doit must return 0 */
> + if (ret >= 0)
> + ret = 0;
> out:
> mutex_unlock(&nbd->config_lock);
> nbd_config_put(nbd);
--
Thanks,
Kuai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-02 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-30 8:20 [PATCH v5 0/8] nbd: eliminate queue freeze/unfreeze overhead in connection setup Yang Erkun
2026-07-30 8:20 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] nbd: simplify find_fallback() by removing redundant logic Yang Erkun
2026-07-30 8:20 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] nbd: disallow NBD_SET_SOCK on an active device Yang Erkun
2026-08-02 11:27 ` yu kuai
2026-07-30 8:20 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] nbd: reset write cache on disconnect Yang Erkun
2026-08-02 11:51 ` yu kuai
2026-08-02 12:02 ` yu kuai
2026-08-03 1:44 ` yangerkun
2026-07-30 8:20 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] nbd: remove queue freeze in nbd_add_socket Yang Erkun
2026-07-30 8:20 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] nbd: skip queue freeze when setting size at device startup Yang Erkun
2026-08-02 11:45 ` yu kuai
2026-08-03 1:48 ` yangerkun
2026-07-30 8:20 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] nbd: factor out a nbd_genl_foreach_sock Yang Erkun
2026-08-02 12:14 ` yu kuai [this message]
2026-08-03 2:09 ` yangerkun
2026-07-30 8:20 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] nbd: remove queue freeze for newly created nbd from netlink path Yang Erkun
2026-08-02 12:16 ` yu kuai
2026-07-30 8:20 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] nbd: add nr_hw_queues module parameter for pre-created devices Yang Erkun
2026-08-02 12:21 ` yu kuai
2026-08-03 2:10 ` yangerkun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=248d334a-5fa5-4568-8083-6249e5cdec78@fygo.io \
--to=yukuai@fygo.io \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
--cc=echo.chenlin@huawei.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=huawei.libin@huawei.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=leijitang@huawei.com \
--cc=leo.lilong@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nbd@other.debian.org \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox