public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: JeffleXu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] virtio-blk: support per-device queue depth
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 09:51:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <25d8430c-bf18-38ca-cf0c-c054507e1466@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46f2f81f-9906-e1f7-d8fd-6da2c61683ba@redhat.com>



On 1/19/21 12:06 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> 
> On 2021/1/19 上午9:33, JeffleXu wrote:
>>
>> On 1/18/21 1:25 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>>> On 2021/1/18 上午11:58, Joseph Qi wrote:
>>>> module parameter 'virtblk_queue_depth' was firstly introduced for
>>>> testing/benchmarking purposes described in commit fc4324b4597c
>>>> ("virtio-blk: base queue-depth on virtqueue ringsize or module param").
>>>> Since we have different virtio-blk devices which have different
>>>> capabilities, it requires that we support per-device queue depth
>>>> instead
>>>> of per-module. So defaultly use vq free elements if module parameter
>>>> 'virtblk_queue_depth' is not set.
>>>
>>> I wonder if it's better to use sysfs instead (or whether it has already
>>> had something like this in the blocker layer).
>>>
>> "/sys/block/<dev>/queue/nr_requests" indeed works, but isn't better to
>> set queue_depth according to the hardware capability at the very first?
>> AFAIK, nvme just set per-device queue_depth at initializing phase.
> 
> 
> I agree, the problem is that the current code may modify module parameter.

The module parameter 'virtblk_queue_depth' is actually remained untainted.

Actually it is the original code before this patch that changes the
module parameter. When the module parameter is not set by boot cmdline
(i.e., default to 0), it will be initialized to the queue_depth of the
vring of the first probed virtio-blk device, and will be revealed to
user space through '/sys/module/virtio_blk/parameters/queue_depth'. I'm
not sure if this behavior is reasonable or not.

The only side effect of this patch is that, now
'/sys/module/virtio_blk/parameters/queue_depth' will be kept as '0' when
the module parameter is not set manually.


Thanks,
Jeffle


>>
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 12 +++++++-----
>>>>    1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
>>>> index 145606d..f83a417 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
>>>> @@ -705,6 +705,7 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device
>>>> *vdev)
>>>>        u32 v, blk_size, max_size, sg_elems, opt_io_size;
>>>>        u16 min_io_size;
>>>>        u8 physical_block_exp, alignment_offset;
>>>> +    unsigned int queue_depth;
>>>>          if (!vdev->config->get) {
>>>>            dev_err(&vdev->dev, "%s failure: config access disabled\n",
>>>> @@ -755,17 +756,18 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device
>>>> *vdev)
>>>>            goto out_free_vq;
>>>>        }
>>>>    -    /* Default queue sizing is to fill the ring. */
>>>> -    if (!virtblk_queue_depth) {
>>>> -        virtblk_queue_depth = vblk->vqs[0].vq->num_free;
>>>> +    if (likely(!virtblk_queue_depth)) {
>>>> +        queue_depth = vblk->vqs[0].vq->num_free;
>>>>            /* ... but without indirect descs, we use 2 descs per req */
>>>>            if (!virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC))
>>>> -            virtblk_queue_depth /= 2;
>>>> +            queue_depth /= 2;
>>>> +    } else {
>>>> +        queue_depth = virtblk_queue_depth;
>>>>        }
>>>>          memset(&vblk->tag_set, 0, sizeof(vblk->tag_set));
>>>>        vblk->tag_set.ops = &virtio_mq_ops;
>>>> -    vblk->tag_set.queue_depth = virtblk_queue_depth;
>>>> +    vblk->tag_set.queue_depth = queue_depth;
>>>>        vblk->tag_set.numa_node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
>>>>        vblk->tag_set.flags = BLK_MQ_F_SHOULD_MERGE;
>>>>        vblk->tag_set.cmd_size =

-- 
Thanks,
Jeffle

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-20  1:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-18  3:58 [PATCH RFC] virtio-blk: support per-device queue depth Joseph Qi
2021-01-18  5:25 ` Jason Wang
2021-01-18  6:06   ` Joseph Qi
2021-01-19  4:04     ` Jason Wang
2021-01-19  1:33   ` JeffleXu
2021-01-19  4:06     ` Jason Wang
2021-01-20  1:51       ` JeffleXu [this message]
2021-01-20  2:47         ` Jason Wang
2021-01-19  4:14 ` Jason Wang
2021-01-22  1:43   ` Joseph Qi
2021-01-22  8:34     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-01-22  9:13       ` Joseph Qi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=25d8430c-bf18-38ca-cf0c-c054507e1466@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox