From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BCABC433F5 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 15:28:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242447AbiCGP3H (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Mar 2022 10:29:07 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59150 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S241186AbiCGP3H (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Mar 2022 10:29:07 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x62a.google.com (mail-ej1-x62a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5BF954683 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 07:28:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ej1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id bi12so19644082ejb.3 for ; Mon, 07 Mar 2022 07:28:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=javigon-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=Dsmq+MlGTQlhsi0/PSWxzY5GTv7L97fyNDmqPka/irU=; b=VQu74XQEaRldE3nhHcGIDsAM9SidUnV6SiqWTJKIjkCHeg0y20QBlT3gshzR5/sm2t xKOzqTP38MphQlkvwOF1iimZFB+IBYn9KOtxS3ADkOTyAHtcqEgHmgkvzfFYzxKRCMH4 4bVWeHHfCdYaOSNVLlwhDtFqjelOy4dXWrsWX1iAXFfx5ARPZJv3R2Jpi38xUgKaT/my 2CNydUHgyZfAIx7bjKiaJN+W3YpHyOzelri54qbm2x51zOIwzYBGKxLoIS1VNRfAB1Wj Czjz0EUo7XnwcicB6dXEy2yBuuSTOefHsEZD1LehQjkPA6wdsHiHpzOSq1pmLG0v+StN cslA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=Dsmq+MlGTQlhsi0/PSWxzY5GTv7L97fyNDmqPka/irU=; b=5y3ffZ3FzqrdoP1Ub6Owi3ZE+wttwE/JvbXZRwHzrWoG3iQEdO57GGFcyjcL3n7+15 UXNmyYsnLrjupW24V1iPM5MIaGa9T+v+SO4iYE7FLy9GZP4HNWPeqyGxMTZvUiToM/F/ Ufll0BtnZyeGrhDSVHBDa2yBirJzYG1KiI5Dc8qE8eWOCgT9WBw9bP0r4miKGgh5W/H2 w4319I4awV0OkfrkGkGE9A+quBSyyumbfINr6bluadIVh6ORRR3eE4Nn6NPsm4qdAd2C nXVJYPrpwSSnUAauwwTfv9WijsRFHo7RIaTqQKsNvAzCdHWALF3bjqLb+0D6rbQR4F8q gmPA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533SLSnsuxQRlxgwFGE7feGTDAjH/IH5Ye+n18m5wktgFWvWmWwO k+oBBmQBpycbWqgnGivP+sEypQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwDUxFUbYYUgG91jFyky1Y4AWrV08+Usjavmt4n0oxvdvEds/LA4HECR4MHtZVV/zdkG5Q1ig== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:9495:b0:6da:9602:3ec6 with SMTP id dm21-20020a170907949500b006da96023ec6mr9580400ejc.589.1646666891149; Mon, 07 Mar 2022 07:28:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtpclient.apple (5.186.121.195.cgn.fibianet.dk. [5.186.121.195]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e22-20020a170906505600b006da7d71f25csm4865412ejk.41.2022.03.07.07.28.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Mar 2022 07:28:10 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: =?utf-8?Q?Javier_Gonz=C3=A1lez?= Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: [LSF/MM/BPF BoF] BoF for Zoned Storage Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 16:28:09 +0100 Message-Id: <28809696-54D0-474E-9243-7FE27DDB732B@javigon.com> References: <20220307151556.GB3260574@dhcp-10-100-145-180.wdc.com> Cc: James Bottomley , Luis Chamberlain , Dave Chinner , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, =?utf-8?Q?Matias_Bj=C3=B8rling?= , Damien Le Moal , Bart Van Assche , Adam Manzanares , Keith Busch , Johannes Thumshirn , Naohiro Aota , Pankaj Raghav , Kanchan Joshi , Nitesh Shetty In-Reply-To: <20220307151556.GB3260574@dhcp-10-100-145-180.wdc.com> To: Keith Busch X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (19D52) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org > On 7 Mar 2022, at 16.16, Keith Busch wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BFOn Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 03:35:12PM +0100, Javier Gonz=C3=A1lez wr= ote: >> As I mentioned in the last reply to to Dave, the main concern for me >> at the moment is supporting arbitrary zone sizes in the kernel. If we >> can agree on a path towards that, we can definitely commit to focus on >> ZoneFS and implement support for it on the different places we >> maintain in user-space.=20 >=20 > FWIW, the block layer doesn't require pow2 chunk_sectors anymore, so it > looks like that requirement for zone sizes can be relaxed, too. Exactly. This is the core of the proposal.=20