From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Martin Steigerwald To: Michael Schmitz Cc: jdow , Geert Uytterhoeven , Jens Axboe , linux-m68k , linux-block@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Subject: [PATCH RFC] block: fix Amiga RDB partition support for disks >= 2 TB Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2018 14:26:09 +0200 Message-ID: <2912295.ZOUXmTqsBm@merkaba> In-Reply-To: References: <20180627012421.80B8F24E094@nmr-admin> <4908196.8QWSOAbfO6@merkaba> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" List-ID: Michael. Michael Schmitz - 01.07.18, 04:43: > Am 30.06.18 um 19:49 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > > I am really inclined to point some AmigaOS 4 developers to this > > discussion and just looked for an archive. Unfortunately there does > > not appear to be a working one. The one mentioned on > >=20 > > http://www.linux-m68k.org/mail.html > >=20 > > http://aire.ncl.ac.uk/Atari/Mailing-Lists/Linux-680x0-vger-List.inde > > x.html > >=20 > > does not send an answer within the HTTP / TCP timeout limit. >=20 > Most of the information found online on m68k will be several years out > of date, I'd expect. The page you appear to have found will be > several decades out of date (any mention of the FTP server at Uni > Saarbruecken for list archives is a dead giveaway). The internet > doesn't forget, but that can be a curse rather than a blessing at > times. >=20 > Anyway, vger sez: >=20 > https://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-m68k&r=3D1&w=3D2 > and > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-m68k/ >=20 > which work for me. >=20 > > I also did not find any archive for linux-block mailing list >=20 > https://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-block works for me. Ah, I thought marc.info was down, but well now I remember that someone=20 took over or something like that. Did not think of spinics.net. Well I wrote a mail to some AmigaOS 4 developers. Whether I get a=20 response remains to be seen. However, in any case I=B4d continue with=20 developing the patch. I=B4d I not make the Linux fix dependent on this. If they share something with me to forward it regarding the Linux patch,=20 I=B4d share that with you. > > And lore.kernel.org only seems to archive LKML itself which is patch > > and the discussion we have here is not CC=B4d to. >=20 > And I'm glad we didn't. :) Thanks, =2D-=20 Martin