From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: Yao Sang <sangyao@kylinos.cn>,
axboe@kernel.dk, kbusch@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, sagi@grimberg.me
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
john.garry@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] block, nvme: add same-LBA multipath limit helpers
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2026 10:44:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <29fd52d0-a4c6-4198-8495-c02ac4de5d8a@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260821101050.1464087-6-sangyao@kylinos.cn>
On 21/08/2026 11:10, Yao Sang wrote:
> A same-LBA multipath head and its paths address the same logical block
> space, so they do not need mapped-range topology calculations.
>
> Add blk_stack_mpath_limits() to stack limits that may differ between
> paths, and blk_set_mpath_head_limits() to set head limits that are
> expected to be identical across paths. Export both helpers and use them
> for NVMe namespace heads.
>
> Initialize max_hw_discard_sectors to UINT_MAX before stacking the first
> path. A zero limit means that a path does not support discard, so it
> disables discard for the head.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yao Sang<sangyao@kylinos.cn>
> ---
> block/blk-settings.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 34 ++-------------------
> drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c | 2 ++
> include/linux/blkdev.h | 3 ++
> 4 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c
> index eaba38370657..8f70bab0a814 100644
> --- a/block/blk-settings.c
> +++ b/block/blk-settings.c
> @@ -800,6 +800,64 @@ static void blk_stack_path_limits(struct queue_limits *t,
> t->dma_alignment = max(t->dma_alignment, b->dma_alignment);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * blk_set_mpath_head_limits - set head limits common to all paths
> + * @t: limits for the multipath head
> + * @b: limits for one path
> + *
> + * Set head limits that are expected to be identical across paths. Stack
> + * limits that may differ between paths with blk_stack_mpath_limits().
> + */
> +void blk_set_mpath_head_limits(struct queue_limits *t,
> + struct queue_limits *b)
nit: mpath_head is a NVMe multipath term, so maybe we need something
more generic
> +{
> + t->logical_block_size = b->logical_block_size;
> + t->physical_block_size = b->physical_block_size;
> + t->alignment_offset = b->alignment_offset;
> + t->io_min = b->io_min;
> + t->io_opt = b->io_opt;
I would not say that io_opt is really fixed for the disk. For SCSI, we
change this value from transport/HBA factors - see sd_revalidate_disk()
and how io_opt may change from the SCSI HBA limits.
I think that you need to take a conservative approach here in deciding
what is a fixed limit for a disk.
> + t->discard_granularity = b->discard_granularity;
> + t->discard_alignment = b->discard_alignment;
> + t->zone_write_granularity = b->zone_write_granularity;
> + t->max_write_streams = b->max_write_streams;
> + t->write_stream_granularity = b->write_stream_granularity;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_set_mpath_head_limits);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-07 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-21 10:10 [PATCH v3 0/5] block, nvme: support same-LBA multipath limit stacking Yao Sang
2026-08-21 10:10 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] nvme: factor namespace-head queue-limit update Yao Sang
2026-08-21 10:10 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] block: factor mapped-range topology out of blk_stack_limits Yao Sang
2026-08-21 10:10 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] block: factor path limits " Yao Sang
2026-08-21 10:10 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] block: factor atomic write hardware limit stacking Yao Sang
2026-08-21 10:10 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] block, nvme: add same-LBA multipath limit helpers Yao Sang
2026-09-07 9:44 ` John Garry [this message]
2026-08-31 8:03 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] block, nvme: support same-LBA multipath limit stacking Yao Sang
2026-09-07 9:34 ` John Garry
2026-09-10 10:08 ` Yao Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=29fd52d0-a4c6-4198-8495-c02ac4de5d8a@oracle.com \
--to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.garry@linux.dev \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=sangyao@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox