From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: Daniel Wagner <wagi@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@atomlin.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Costa Shulyupin <costa.shul@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, megaraidlinux.pdl@broadcom.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, storagedev@microchip.com,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@marvell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/10] lib/group_cpus: Add group_masks_cpus_evenly()
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 09:28:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2b70fbd3-d63d-4bd3-8500-e14c41fc64b9@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250702-isolcpus-io-queues-v7-1-557aa7eacce4@kernel.org>
On 02/07/2025 17:33, Daniel Wagner wrote:
/s/group_masks_cpus_evenly/group_mask_cpus_evenly/
> group_mask_cpus_evenly() allows the caller to pass in a CPU mask that
> should be evenly distributed. This new function is a more generic
> version of the existing group_cpus_evenly(), which always distributes
> all present CPUs into groups.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <wagi@kernel.org>
> ---
> include/linux/group_cpus.h | 3 +++
> lib/group_cpus.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/group_cpus.h b/include/linux/group_cpus.h
> index 9d4e5ab6c314b31c09fda82c3f6ac18f77e9de36..d4604dce1316a08400e982039006331f34c18ee8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/group_cpus.h
> +++ b/include/linux/group_cpus.h
> @@ -10,5 +10,8 @@
> #include <linux/cpu.h>
>
> struct cpumask *group_cpus_evenly(unsigned int numgrps, unsigned int *nummasks);
> +struct cpumask *group_mask_cpus_evenly(unsigned int numgrps,
> + const struct cpumask *cpu_mask,
> + unsigned int *nummasks);
>
> #endif
> diff --git a/lib/group_cpus.c b/lib/group_cpus.c
> index 6d08ac05f371bf880571507d935d9eb501616a84..00c9b7a10c8acd29239fe20d2a30fdae22ef74a5 100644
> --- a/lib/group_cpus.c
> +++ b/lib/group_cpus.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> #include <linux/cpu.h>
> #include <linux/sort.h>
> #include <linux/group_cpus.h>
> +#include <linux/sched/isolation.h>
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>
> @@ -425,6 +426,59 @@ struct cpumask *group_cpus_evenly(unsigned int numgrps, unsigned int *nummasks)
> *nummasks = min(nr_present + nr_others, numgrps);
> return masks;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(group_cpus_evenly);
> +
> +/**
> + * group_mask_cpus_evenly - Group all CPUs evenly per NUMA/CPU locality
> + * @numgrps: number of groups
this comment could be a bit more useful
> + * @cpu_mask: CPU to consider for the grouping
this is a CPU mask, and not a specific CPU index, right?
> + * @nummasks: number of initialized cpusmasks
> + *
> + * Return: cpumask array if successful, NULL otherwise. And each element
> + * includes CPUs assigned to this group.
> + *
> + * Try to put close CPUs from viewpoint of CPU and NUMA locality into
> + * same group. Allocate present CPUs on these groups evenly.
> + */
> +struct cpumask *group_mask_cpus_evenly(unsigned int numgrps,
> + const struct cpumask *cpu_mask,
> + unsigned int *nummasks)
> +{
> + cpumask_var_t *node_to_cpumask;
> + cpumask_var_t nmsk;
> + int ret = -ENOMEM;
> + struct cpumask *masks = NULL;
> +
> + if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&nmsk, GFP_KERNEL))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + node_to_cpumask = alloc_node_to_cpumask();
> + if (!node_to_cpumask)
> + goto fail_nmsk;
> +
> + masks = kcalloc(numgrps, sizeof(*masks), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!masks)
> + goto fail_node_to_cpumask;
> +
> + build_node_to_cpumask(node_to_cpumask);
> +
> + ret = __group_cpus_evenly(0, numgrps, node_to_cpumask, cpu_mask, nmsk,
> + masks);
maybe it's personal taste, but I don't think that it's a good style to
always pass through 'fail' labels, even if we have not failed in some step
> +
> +fail_node_to_cpumask:
> + free_node_to_cpumask(node_to_cpumask);
> +
> +fail_nmsk:
> + free_cpumask_var(nmsk);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + kfree(masks);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> + *nummasks = ret;
> + return masks;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(group_mask_cpus_evenly);
> +
> #else /* CONFIG_SMP */
> struct cpumask *group_cpus_evenly(unsigned int numgrps, unsigned int *nummasks)
> {
> @@ -442,5 +496,13 @@ struct cpumask *group_cpus_evenly(unsigned int numgrps, unsigned int *nummasks)
> *nummasks = 1;
> return masks;
> }
> -#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(group_cpus_evenly);
> +
> +struct cpumask *group_mask_cpus_evenly(unsigned int numgrps,
> + const struct cpumask *cpu_mask,
> + unsigned int *nummasks)
> +{
> + return group_cpus_evenly(numgrps, nummasks);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(group_mask_cpus_evenly);
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-11 8:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-02 16:33 [PATCH v7 00/10] blk: honor isolcpus configuration Daniel Wagner
2025-07-02 16:33 ` [PATCH v7 01/10] lib/group_cpus: Add group_masks_cpus_evenly() Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03 6:18 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-09-03 12:36 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-07-11 8:28 ` John Garry [this message]
2025-09-03 12:42 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-07-02 16:33 ` [PATCH v7 02/10] genirq/affinity: Add cpumask to struct irq_affinity Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03 6:19 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-02 16:33 ` [PATCH v7 03/10] blk-mq: add blk_mq_{online|possible}_queue_affinity Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03 6:29 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-02 16:33 ` [PATCH v7 04/10] nvme-pci: use block layer helpers to constrain queue affinity Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03 6:29 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-02 16:33 ` [PATCH v7 05/10] scsi: Use " Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03 6:43 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-04 9:37 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-07-04 10:28 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-04 12:30 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-07-02 16:33 ` [PATCH v7 06/10] virtio: blk/scsi: use " Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03 6:43 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-02 16:33 ` [PATCH v7 07/10] isolation: Introduce io_queue isolcpus type Daniel Wagner
2025-07-08 1:26 ` Aaron Tomlin
2025-07-02 16:33 ` [PATCH v7 08/10] blk-mq: use hk cpus only when isolcpus=io_queue is enabled Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03 6:58 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-04 9:21 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03 9:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-04 9:00 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-07-07 5:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-03 14:47 ` kernel test robot
2025-07-02 16:33 ` [PATCH v7 09/10] blk-mq: prevent offlining hk CPUs with associated online isolated CPUs Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03 6:58 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-07 7:44 ` Ming Lei
2025-07-08 1:31 ` Aaron Tomlin
2025-07-08 1:23 ` Aaron Tomlin
2025-07-02 16:34 ` [PATCH v7 10/10] docs: add io_queue flag to isolcpus Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03 6:59 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-08 1:26 ` Aaron Tomlin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2b70fbd3-d63d-4bd3-8500-e14c41fc64b9@oracle.com \
--to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@marvell.com \
--cc=atomlin@atomlin.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=costa.shul@redhat.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llong@redhat.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=megaraidlinux.pdl@broadcom.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=storagedev@microchip.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=wagi@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).