From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0DA3C433FE for ; Fri, 20 May 2022 06:24:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1345293AbiETGYB (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 May 2022 02:24:01 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55022 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232003AbiETGYB (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 May 2022 02:24:01 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AF1F14C751; Thu, 19 May 2022 23:23:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kwepemi100024.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.57]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4L4Gr72S9fzhZCv; Fri, 20 May 2022 14:23:19 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemm600009.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.164) by kwepemi100024.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.87) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Fri, 20 May 2022 14:23:56 +0800 Received: from [10.174.176.73] (10.174.176.73) by kwepemm600009.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.164) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Fri, 20 May 2022 14:23:56 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v2] blk-mq: fix panic during blk_mq_run_work_fn() To: Ming Lei CC: , , , References: <20220520032542.3331610-1-yukuai3@huawei.com> From: "yukuai (C)" Message-ID: <2b7a82e0-1e33-e2ff-74d7-d80f152fdc75@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 14:23:55 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gbk"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.176.73] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.183) To kwepemm600009.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.164) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org ÔÚ 2022/05/20 11:44, Ming Lei дµÀ: > On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 11:25:42AM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote: >> Our test report a following crash: >> >> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000018 >> PGD 0 P4D 0 >> Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI >> CPU: 6 PID: 265 Comm: kworker/6:1H Kdump: loaded Tainted: G O 5.10.0-60.17.0.h43.eulerosv2r11.x86_64 #1 >> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.1-0-ga5cab58-20220320_160524-szxrtosci10000 04/01/2014 >> Workqueue: kblockd blk_mq_run_work_fn >> RIP: 0010:blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queues+0xb6/0xe0 >> RSP: 0018:ffffacc6803d3d88 EFLAGS: 00010246 >> RAX: 0000000000000006 RBX: ffff99e2c3d25008 RCX: 00000000ffffffff >> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000003 RDI: ffff99e2c911ae18 >> RBP: ffffacc6803d3dd8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff99e2c0901f6c >> R10: 0000000000000018 R11: 0000000000000018 R12: ffff99e2c911ae18 >> R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000003 R15: ffff99e2c911ae18 >> FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff99e6bbf00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 >> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 >> CR2: 0000000000000018 CR3: 000000007460a006 CR4: 00000000003706e0 >> Call Trace: >> __blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched+0x2a7/0x2c0 >> ? newidle_balance+0x23e/0x2f0 >> __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x13f/0x190 >> blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x30/0x60 >> __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x47/0xd0 >> process_one_work+0x1b0/0x350 >> worker_thread+0x49/0x300 >> ? rescuer_thread+0x3a0/0x3a0 >> kthread+0xfe/0x140 >> ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90 >> ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 >> >> After digging from vmcore, I found that the queue is cleaned >> up(blk_cleanup_queue() is done) and tag set is >> freed(blk_mq_free_tag_set() is done). >> >> There are two problems here: >> >> 1) blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queues() will only be called from >> __blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched() if e->type->ops.has_work() return true. >> This seems impossible because blk_cleanup_queue() is done, and there >> should be no io. Commit ddc25c86b466 ("block, bfq: make bfq_has_work() >> more accurate") fix the problem in bfq. And currently ohter schedulers >> don't have such problem. >> >> 2) 'hctx->run_work' still exists after blk_cleanup_queue(). >> blk_mq_cancel_work_sync() is called from blk_cleanup_queue() to cancel >> all the 'run_work'. However, there is no guarantee that new 'run_work' >> won't be queued after that(and before blk_mq_exit_queue() is done). > > It is blk_mq_run_hw_queue() caller's responsibility to grab > ->q_usage_counter for avoiding queue cleaned up, so please fix the user > side. > Hi, Thanks for your advice. blk_mq_run_hw_queue() can be called async, in order to do that, what I can think of is that grab 'q_usage_counte' before queuing 'run->work' and release it after. Which is very similar to this patch... Kuai > > Thanks, > Ming > > . >