From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
ulf.hansson@linaro.org, shawn.lin@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] block: define new rqf_flags RQF_XFER_SINGLE_BLK
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 13:16:34 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <33177597-8df5-4494-830e-6e287bb8188a@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260324191126.kfhwuw4njinh2vrw@iaqt7>
On 3/24/26 1:11 PM, Bin Liu wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 12:48:11PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 3/24/26 8:34 AM, Bin Liu wrote:
>>> This new flag will be used to handle multi-block transfer failure, in
>>> which case single-block transfer will be used.
>>
>> Maybe I missed this in previous discussions, but why can't this flag go
>> into struct mmc_queue_req?
>
> You didn't miss anything. We didn't discuss about it until now.
>
> I added the flag in struct request because it already has rq_flags to
> host all the flag bits. But I don't see struct mmc_queue_req has any
> member for this flag purpose. Do you mean we should add a new flag
> member into struct mmc_queue_req?
It's a bad idea to add driver specific flag to the core flags,
particularly when you already have per-rq data associated with the
driver. Then it should surely go there. The block layer doesn't care
about RQF_XFER_SINGLE_BLK, that's strictly a device property. Hence it
should go in the driver, NOT in the block layer.
So yes, add a bool or flags or whatever you need on the driver side.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-24 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-10 16:04 [PATCH] mmc: block: use single block write in retry Bin Liu
2026-03-16 15:01 ` Ulf Hansson
2026-03-16 16:22 ` Bin Liu
2026-03-24 12:44 ` Ulf Hansson
2026-03-17 12:46 ` Shawn Lin
2026-03-17 13:24 ` Bin Liu
2026-03-18 1:43 ` Shawn Lin
2026-03-18 14:55 ` Bin Liu
2026-03-18 15:10 ` Bin Liu
2026-03-18 15:17 ` Bin Liu
2026-03-23 13:05 ` Bin Liu
2026-03-24 7:34 ` Shawn Lin
2026-03-24 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Bin Liu
2026-03-24 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] block: define new rqf_flags RQF_XFER_SINGLE_BLK Bin Liu
2026-03-24 18:48 ` Jens Axboe
2026-03-24 19:11 ` Bin Liu
2026-03-24 19:16 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2026-03-24 20:41 ` Bin Liu
2026-03-24 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: block: use single block write in retry Bin Liu
2026-03-24 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Ulf Hansson
2026-03-24 19:17 ` Jens Axboe
2026-03-25 13:49 ` [PATCH v3] " Bin Liu
2026-03-25 14:12 ` Jens Axboe
2026-03-25 14:21 ` Bin Liu
2026-03-25 14:23 ` Jens Axboe
2026-03-25 14:27 ` Bin Liu
2026-03-25 15:22 ` Ulf Hansson
2026-03-25 15:29 ` Bin Liu
2026-03-26 12:33 ` Ulf Hansson
2026-03-26 13:41 ` Bin Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=33177597-8df5-4494-830e-6e287bb8188a@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=b-liu@ti.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shawn.lin@linux.dev \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox