From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f175.google.com (mail-pl1-f175.google.com [209.85.214.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC5953DB81; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 21:31:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-pl1-f175.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1d51ba18e1bso27622415ad.0; Tue, 09 Jan 2024 13:31:53 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704835913; x=1705440713; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=k2HSg/AmhYZcGkcbY0eGgy1Bb+DyP7rKRWI4KTFYTp8=; b=KIlrb/gppm4WFt5sD8lJ6PMMS3GqYh4iFk3CU5hXXDypbIjtyA3r6bfbDTpf2jc/YU ihYOiV/QAbg6+5t64tAHsapBaTK2ORNq24Bpr8BQyuvKMDmBm7Y7U/KZenmoKBHKJ44r BeGLB+SZHdFGTG/LuwqX/2jgcI81WrhaXw9e21BtpeWKCREaKIRxFE7/X7FFfDiv4cZd C6/gQ6kFyI4jiV495euKgtQhNLAne+GWm6V4E/5IlZJKraJf9KGF84nexml7Poj5cutu rnoMei4h86waThOLsxfMW4sOhp7YQLXQst3f151h5+GHbpBiDt/A9itL9R1hc8XG5PB8 0Jsg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxwxfPcIeT5m9JAd9J2FCQDdZLncbccBXzW7KcUPATiB0hfAZVJ O3LftVGWqOAdvsECGYzrGnM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGgEoQ64du2K0/Q9WBgQuZMDtB5igrtdQVepbGX4TmcvhjuKUR8/XlFeDlu1Dyk5zxvLefSFw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d50e:b0:1d3:ee1f:ce54 with SMTP id b14-20020a170902d50e00b001d3ee1fce54mr24664plg.89.1704835912946; Tue, 09 Jan 2024 13:31:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2620:0:1000:8411:b76f:b657:4602:d182? ([2620:0:1000:8411:b76f:b657:4602:d182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e2-20020a170902b78200b001d491db286fsm2245078pls.282.2024.01.09.13.31.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Jan 2024 13:31:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <33213b76-07f2-4b75-9940-679ec8f06975@acm.org> Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 13:31:48 -0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [LSF/MM/BPF ATTEND][LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] : blktests: status, expansion plan for the storage stack test framework Content-Language: en-US To: Chaitanya Kulkarni , "lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org >> linux-fsdevel" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" Cc: Jens Axboe , "josef@toxicpanda.com" , Amir Goldstein , =?UTF-8?Q?Javier_Gonz=C3=A1lez?= , Dan Williams , Christoph Hellwig , Keith Busch , Hannes Reinecke , Damien Le Moal , "shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com" , Johannes Thumshirn , "jack@suse.com" , Ming Lei , Sagi Grimberg , Theodore Ts'o , "daniel@iogearbox.net" , Daniel Wagner References: From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 1/8/24 22:30, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote: > 5. Potentially adding VM support in the blktests. What is "VM support"? I'm running blktests in a VM all the time since this test suite was introduced. Bart.